Uncategorized

More on the bill purporting to ban Sharia law

The good people at Imagine 2050, a group committed to making America’s increasingly diverse and multi-racial society work for everyone have posted a report on the cookie-cutter legislation passed last week by the House that seeks to respond to the imaginary threat of “Sharia law.”  

The post also reports that the troubled characters behind the movement to pass such bills into law around the country by the American Laws for American Courts initiative (ALAC):

“Some news outlets and blogs have even mentioned the bill’s roots in the ALAC model. Equally, or perhaps more, important is this bill’s link to the original ALAC author, David Yerushalmi, an anti-Muslim activist and lawyer with a record of extremist rhetoric and questionable ties.

Yerushalmi is the founder of Society of Americans for National Existence (SANE), an advocacy group that has published anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and anti-black materials. The group also pushed legislation that would make adherence to sharia “a felony punishable by 20 years in prison.” According to the Anti-Defamation League, SANE asked Congress to declare war on the “Muslim nation” and to declare undocumented Muslim immigrants alien enemies.”

The post goes on to note that:

“It should go without saying that American courts do not need bills like H695 to prevent foreign laws from superseding provisions already set by the state and federal constitutions. The dubious origins of H695, show that this bill is not preventative, nor is it about preserving family court, as it’s proponents claim. Rather, H695 is part of a coordinated effort to discriminate against and marginalize religious minorities, particularly Muslims. Such a bill could also introduce a number of unintended consequences, as noted in a new report by the Center for American Progress.”

Click here to read the entire post.

Check Also

Renee Ellmers nabs gig in Trump administration

Renee Ellmers has been named to a mid-level ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that the North Carolina GOP drew unconstitutionally racially ger [...]

As the N.C. House puts together its budget this week, the same thought is on the minds of representa [...]

Wednesday was the 63rd anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, the milestone U.S. Sup [...]

So, the question as always comes down to one of vision. The elected chieftains who decide how much m [...]

2.8 billion---amount in dollars of needs in communities across the state for rebuilding efforts from [...]

The post Crumbs appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In the past few months, North Carolinians have seen our General Assembly make national news several [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more