Uncategorized

Pro-choice advocates respond to abortion propaganda bill

From the good folks at NARAL Pro-Choice NC:

Anti-Choice Sex-Education Bill Passes the House, on route to the Governor’s Desk
NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina says Young People Deserve the Facts

For Immediate Release – June 27, 2013

RALEIGH, NC., This afternoon, the House passed SB 132 by a vote of 68 to 42. “This bill is part of an extreme anti-choice agenda by leaders in the General Assembly to ban abortion in North Carolina.” said Suzanne Buckley, Executive Director of NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina. “While the Governor and his allies in the House may claim that this bill is about education, the debate on the House floor yesterday and today have made it abundantly clear that lawmakers behind this bill are more concerned with advancing their political agenda than promoting accurate information in sex education. The fact that this bill never made it to the Education Committee is further evidence that it has nothing to do with education, and everything to do with an anti-choice political agenda.” Buckley continued. “Any claim to the contrary is disingenuous.”

This bill would amend the Healthy Youth Act, forcing educators to spread misinformation about abortion.  “We can all agree that young people deserve accurate information, especially in school.  Even in its current form, this bill would force teachers to lie to students about abortion care,” said Suzanne Buckley, Executive Director of NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina. In debate about the bill, pro-choice lawmakers pointed out that SB 132 never went to the Education Committee and that public comment was denied. “No teacher should be forced to lie to his or her students because of some extreme politician’s out-of-touch agenda” Buckley continued.

The bill is not about protecting or promoting our teen’s health, it’s about inserting anti-choice and medically unsupported rhetoric into our classrooms. SB 132 would force teachers to tell students, starting in seventh grade, that abortion is a risk factor for pre-term delivery later in life. “This statement is utterly false. No respected medical authority has found evidence that links abortion care to later adverse effects on a woman’s reproductive health and fertility,” said Buckley. “Young people need facts about their health, not political propaganda.”

The bill will land on the Governor’s desk in the next few weeks. “The Governor made a promise not to support any new restrictions on abortion access in our state. Now that this bill has passed and is headed to the House for concurrence, we at NARAL Pro-Choice North Carolina and thousands of pro-choice supporters across the state will be watching to see whether McCrory will keep his promise, or turn his back on women and families,” said Buckley.

###

7 Comments


  1. James Protzman

    June 27, 2013 at 2:38 pm

    Not to worry. McCrory promised he wouldn’t sign any bills like this.

    And we all know what his word is worth.

  2. Doug

    June 27, 2013 at 3:31 pm

    Just because the choice included is not your favored choice does not mean it is “anti-choice”. This blog post is pure propaganda.

  3. gregflynn

    June 27, 2013 at 4:18 pm

    I don’t think there is anyone here who would describe abortion as a “favored choice”. The bill is anti-choice because it singles out a tenuous link to abortion for special attention while disregarding many other factors that actually do increase the risk of preterm birth.

  4. Harri

    June 28, 2013 at 6:47 am

    Anti abortion stand is just taking us back to where we where. Leave women choose what is right for them. Each woman knows better what is right for her. So, why should we be concerned?

  5. Phil Burton

    June 28, 2013 at 6:49 am

    What is the world is all this abortion crap??? We went through this when I was a teenager 1,000 years ago. Why in the world is it still an issue?? There is so much misinformation and so many inflammatory remarks about abortion. Time to cool it when it comes to legislating medical procedures. What’s next, tonsillectomy?

  6. Susan Moses

    June 28, 2013 at 2:23 pm

    We need a Wendy Davis in North Carolina, NOW.

  7. Alex

    June 28, 2013 at 10:07 pm

    Good science, by definition, allows for more than one opinion. Otherwise you merely have the will of one man, which is the basis of a cult.

Check Also

This Week’s Top Five on NC Policy Watch

1. Free speech policy, controversial conservative academic on ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The UNC Board of Governors is holding its last meeting of 2017 Friday, where the latest of its many [...]

Just south of Candler off the Pisgah Highway is a lovely piece of property on Little Piney Mountain [...]

Veteran North Carolina education policy expert Kris Nordstrom has authored a new and vitally importa [...]

When Joni Robbins, a section chief in the N.C. Department of Public Instruction, closes bidding next [...]

“All speech is free, but some speech is more free than others.” This seems to be the motto of the cu [...]

Trumpists prepare to raze another vital common good law It’s hard to keep up these days with the flo [...]

The post That’s how ‘Humbug’ is done appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

The solid citizens of Johnston County, N.C. – in a fateful quirk of geography – for several years ha [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more