The hypocrisy of the school voucher plan

School vouchersIn 2012, many of the politicians who now control the North Carolina General Assembly ran on pledges of “fiscal conservatism” and reducing government spending. Indeed, many prominent members of the current majority continue to style themselves as “common-sense fiscal conservatives.”

There’s a disappointing lack of common sense, however, in the proposed “Opportunity Scholarships” program included in the current House budget. The program would provide school vouchers—up to $4,200 each—for K-12 students to attend private schools instead of traditional public schools. The current budget proposal appropriates $10 million for the program in the first year, and jumps to $40 million for the second. In a time of huge cuts to our public school system, there is no common sense in taking much needed resources from our students and teachers and asking them again to somehow do more with less.

Instead of being fiscally conservative, this voucher scheme is fiscally irresponsible, since it will cost the state money every year after the first. In fact, the larger the program becomes, the more money it will lose for North Carolinians.

Voucher proponents initially claimed that the vouchers would save money. These claims were abandoned, however, after the official fiscal note accompanying the original bill (House Bill 944) demonstrated that the voucher program will save the state money only in the first year. For each subsequent year, the program will drain at least $2 million and potentially over $12 million in a single year. The long-term cost to our public schools from these vouchers far outweighs any initial savings the program might deliver.

Although vouchers have been portrayed as a “way out” for struggling public school students, the reality is that many of these “scholarships” will go to children who were planning on attending private schools anyway. According to the same fiscal note, approximately 2,977 (30%) of the 9,925 vouchers to be awarded in 2014 will go to students who would have attended a private school even without a voucher (this includes kindergarteners, first graders, foster children, children adopted during the previous school year, and students who were already planning to transfer from public to private schools). This will cost $11.88 million. If public school students take the remaining 6,948 vouchers, they will save the State $881 each (current per-pupil expenditure of $4,871 minus projected average voucher amount of $3,990), for a total reduction of $6.12 million. That leaves North Carolina’s taxpayers with a $5.76 million bill for vouchers–and traditional public schools with 40 million fewer dollars to spend on students.

The General Assembly’s willingness to throw the state further into debt in order to create an unnecessary and costly voucher program reveals the failure of “fiscal conservatives” to live up to their own promises and values. One thing is very clear: this program is not about saving money. It is not about holding schools accountable either, since private schools are not subject to the same reporting requirements as public schools. Perhaps most importantly, it cannot be about improving student achievement, since research shows that students who took vouchers in Milwaukee and Cleveland did not show significant improvement on standardized tests when compared to similarly situated public school students. Rather, these “scholarships” represent just one more dimension of the extreme privatization/anti-government agenda of the state’s current leadership.

Let’s hope that the combination of sunlight and public pressure convince lawmakers to turn back from this costly and potentially disastrous path. After all, they ought to know: we shouldn’t be spending scarce public funds on failed programs that we do not need. It’s just common sense.


  1. Jack

    July 12, 2013 at 10:08 am

    Have you seen the K12 commercial?

  2. Save Our Schools

    July 12, 2013 at 11:58 am

    I recently asked a state senator from Down East about the Republican Party’s vision for public schools in the next 5 years, and he told me he saw public schools becoming the last resort for those that weren’t good enough, behaviorally or academically, to make it in charter and private schools. We will set aside the fact that these schools cherry pick their kids so that they can show how much better they are. I think this shows that the current GA does have a privatization agenda for everything, including public schools, which are not and should not be run like businesses. However, there is another more insidious agenda in this that comes from a lot of voters. This is a drive to segregate schools by socio-economic status. Many parents, regardless of race, now want to be able to “choose” for their students to go to school with certain types of people and receive public funds to do it because it makes it easier on their own finances. Our own selfishness has grown to the point that we do not feel a collective responsibility to do our best for all students anymore. We only care about our own. How does that kind of attitude contribute to the theory of “democracy”? Our state used to be respected as a place where we “took care of our own.” I was born and raised here, and the current GA makes me ashamed of my state. By the way, that state senator lived his life outside of NC and retired to our area.

  3. david esmay

    July 14, 2013 at 9:09 pm

    Bingo, Save our Schools.

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Nearly half of the female students at UNC-Chapel Hill have experienced some form of sexual assault b [...]

Despite concerns, Treasurer Dale Folwell maintains state investments in much-criticized company that [...]

If you only look at the unemployment rate and the stock market, you probably think most families are [...]

It’s a strikingly familiar tale in North Carolina: voters are waiting with bated breath for a court [...]

When the journalist Michael Kinsley wrote in 1984 that a gaffe “is when a politician tells the truth [...]

Tonight's Democratic presidential debate will be dominated by two urgent issues: the House of R [...]

Supporters of public education fight back against empty promises of state’s school privatization mov [...]

Survey of hold-out states indicates the Medicaid expansion debate has entered a new phase Across the [...]