Uncategorized

Budget impact on the courts

Here are the quick courts-related highlights from the final budget proposed by the General Assembly, likely to be voted upon and sent to the governor this week:

  • Cuts funding to the Administrative Office of the Courts by $4 million in each fiscal year (203-14 and 2014-15).
  • Restores funding for 22 magistrates, and calls for a study of how magistrates are allocated throughout the state.
  • Provides no funding for Drug Treatment Courts. The governor had proposed $3.6 million in funding for these courts, which he highlighted when he announced his budget.
  • Lets Rep. Justin Burr have his way, changing the configuration of district courts in the eastern part of the state so that his county, Stanly County, is a stand-alone district.
  • Does not cut funding for court reporters, but calls for a study on their use and compensation statewide.
  • Does not transfer attorneys general to the agencies that they represent, but calls for a study and recommendations by the 2014 regular session.
  • Cuts funding for the Prisoner Legal Services contract by $890,000. The governor had called for a $231,000 reduction.
  • Reclassifies certain low-level offenses to misdemeanors punishable by fines, as opposed to jail time, resulting in a projected $2 million savings from not having to provide counsel for those so charged. (Under the Sixth Amendment and U.S. Supreme Court case law, only defendants charged with offenses punishable by jail time have a right to counsel). This means that those charged with such offenses can now be convicted — and have a criminal record with all the attendant collateral consequences — without counsel to represent them.

No new funding is provided for the courts, which continue to be understaffed, overworked and woefully behind the times in terms of technology.

One Comment


  1. Louie

    July 22, 2013 at 12:18 pm

    administering ‘the New Jim Crow’ is expensive to taxpayers

Check Also

State Supreme Court rules retroactive application of teacher tenure repeal is unconstitutional

The state Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

As the N.C. House puts together its budget this week, the same thought is on the minds of representa [...]

Wednesday was the 63rd anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, the milestone U.S. Sup [...]

A Q&A with key players ahead of today’s House vote House lawmakers are expected to vote today on [...]

So, the question as always comes down to one of vision. The elected chieftains who decide how much m [...]

2.8 billion---amount in dollars of needs in communities across the state for rebuilding efforts from [...]

The post Crumbs appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In the past few months, North Carolinians have seen our General Assembly make national news several [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more