Uncategorized

Conservatives on 2014 judicial elections: “Lose the courts, lose the war”

It’s been just nine months since the headline-grabbing, multi-million dollar Supreme Court race between Justice Paul Newby and Court of Appeals Judge Sam Ervin IV came to a close, but already Republican candidates for the 2014 high court elections are gearing up for what might be an extravaganza — more candidates and lots more money, particularly if Gov. Pat McCrory signs into law proposals passed by the General Assembly unleash campaign fundraising.

Republican justices currently hold a 4-3 majority on the ostensibly nonpartisan court, and maintaining that control is critical to ensuring Republican control elsewhere throughout the state, according to conservative consultant John Davis — who in reports he’s entitled “How the North Carolina Republican Party Can Maintain Political Power for 114 Years,”  has labeled this as his Rule #5: “Lose the courts, lose the war.”

Says Davis:

The Republican majority has a right to initiate radical reforms. Everyone else has a right to sue them.  That’s why next year’s Supreme Court races are critical for long-term Republican political dominance.

In 2014, four of the seven Supreme Court justice seats are up for grabs.

Chief Justice Sarah Parker, a Democrat, is retiring and Justice Mark Martin, a Republican, is running for her spot.  No Democratic candidate has yet announced an intention to challenge Martin for the Chief Justice position.

For Martin’s vacant seat and the other two open seats — held by Democratic Justices Robin Hudson and Cheri Beasley — only Republicans have thrown their hats in the ring so far. Court of Appeals Judge Bob Hunter is running for Martin’s seat (the two have the same campaign treasurer). And Senior Resident Superior Court Judge Ola Lewis from Brunswick County is challenging Justice Beasley. (No one has yet announced a challenge to Justice Hudson.)

And the Republican candidates have their campaigns up and running, particularly Martin, who, according to State Board of Elections records, had already raised nearly $100,000 from contributions through June 30, 2013.

That amount may be just be a fraction of what gets raised and spent if the governor signs House 589, which among other things eliminates public funding for judicial races, raises the amount of permissible contributions to $5000, and minimizes or eliminates disclosure requirements for independent expenditure committees like those that poured millions into the Newby-Ervin race.

 

One Comment


  1. HunterC

    August 12, 2013 at 2:23 pm

    Worth noting:

    Some of the 4 NC justices up for election in 2014 got a slapdown from the US Supreme Court in Wos v. E.M.A. this term.

    Namely, Mark Martin and his brethren joined an opinion that even Justice Alito disagreed with.

    NC Justice Robin Hudson wrote the argument that eventually prevailed.

Check Also

State Supreme Court rules retroactive application of teacher tenure repeal is unconstitutional

The state Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that the North Carolina GOP drew unconstitutionally racially ger [...]

As the N.C. House puts together its budget this week, the same thought is on the minds of representa [...]

Wednesday was the 63rd anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, the milestone U.S. Sup [...]

So, the question as always comes down to one of vision. The elected chieftains who decide how much m [...]

2.8 billion---amount in dollars of needs in communities across the state for rebuilding efforts from [...]

The post Crumbs appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In the past few months, North Carolinians have seen our General Assembly make national news several [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more