- The Progressive Pulse - http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org -
Radicals, not conservatives, holding U.S. government hostage
Posted By Rob Schofield On October 3, 2013 @ 10:53 am In Uncategorized | Comments Disabled
Veteran poltical scientist Norman Orenstein hits the nail on the head in this morning’s column for The Atlantic , which is entitled: ”The Republican Hardliners Aren’t Conservatives, They’re Radicals.”
“In their third iteration of shutdown poker, House Republicans eagerly seized on a new approach : to demand the removal of all subsidies for members of Congress and their staffs for health insurance. They framed this as treating Congress just like other Americans. It is utter nonsense. Most Americans have health insurance through their employers, and the lion’s share of their insurance premiums are paid — tax free — by their employers. Nothing in the Affordable Care Act will change this. Members of Congress and their staff have traditionally been treated the same as other federal employees; they purchase insurance on the federal employees health insurance marketplace, with 72 percent of their premiums covered.
A capricious amendment to the Affordable Care Act offered by Senator Chuck Grassley, an Iowa Republican, moved senators and their staffs off the federal employee health marketplace and onto the new Affordable Care Act exchanges, but it left ambiguous whether their subsidies would remain. (Grassley, remember, engaged in sham negotiations with his “friend” Max Baucus for many months in 2009 to find common ground and compromise on a health reform plan that was based on his own ardent support for the Republican plan to counter the Clinton health plan in 1993-94; he, however, pulled the rug out from under those negotiations and denounced in the strongest terms things he had strongly supported before Barack Obama became president.) Urged on by a bipartisan group of senators, including Tom Coburn, who feared that the removal of subsidies — a unique punishment — would result in a major brain drain in personal offices and committees, the administration said that the subsidies could remain, albeit in a very constrained form.
For the past month or more, Senator David Vitter, a Louisiana Republican, has blocked every significant action in the Senate, whether important for national security, homeland security, or the ability of Senate committees to function, in return for his demand to knock those subsidies out. Now House Republicans have jumped on this faux-populist bandwagon, knowing that anything that smacks of special privilege for Congress — even if falsely so — will be popular back home.
I have talked to enough Senate staffers and senators to know that the fear of a brain drain is real. Many of the most seasoned committee employees, who have enough seniority to retire but who stay in their jobs because they love public service, will bail out if their pay is suddenly cut by several thousand dollars due to the loss of the employer contribution for health insurance. So will plenty of staffers making $40,000 or $50,000, for whom the hit would be proportionately more severe. The Senate as an institution will suffer significantly from a loss of institutional memory and savvy that contributes to a functioning chamber and better laws being written — which ought to be a goal of liberals and conservatives alike.
But many senators who privately complain about Vitter’s obstructionism and demagoguery have been unwilling to stand up and vote to stop him; Republicans in the Senate voted in lockstep to support the House plan.
All that is part of a larger problem that exists, one that has had me referring to the drivers in the GOP not as conservatives but as radicals. Rod Dreher, writing in The American Conservative in a piece called “Republicans, Over the Cliff,” eloquently makes the same point. Conservatives believe in limited government — but also that the government we need to have — the services from national security to homeland security to interstate transportation — should be efficiently and competently provided, and that when government intervenes, it should do so with as much deference to the marketplace as possible.
The current drivers of the GOP are much more hostile to government….”
Read the rest of Orenstein’s column by clicking here .
Article printed from The Progressive Pulse: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org
URL to article: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/10/03/radicals-not-conservatives-holding-u-s-government-hostage/
URLs in this post:
 this morning’s column for : http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/10/the-republican-hardliners-arent-conservatives-theyre-radicals/280217/
 seized on a new approach: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/09/house-republicans-have-decided-to-go-big-rather-than-stop-a-shutdown/280124/
 “Republicans, Over the Cliff,” : http://www.theamericanconservative.com/dreher/republicans-over-the-cliff/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=republicans-over-the-cliff
 Why do individuals pay slightly more for health coverage in NC under the ACA? Lack of competition: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/09/26/why-do-individuals-pay-slightly-more-for-health-coverage-in-nc-under-the-aca-lack-of-competition/
 Even Marc Landry deserves a helping hand: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/08/21/even-marc-landry-deserves-a-helping-hand/
 Calculate NC ACA health plan premiums by zip, income, family size: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/09/25/calculate-nc-aca-health-plan-premiums-by-zip-income-family-size/
 New poll: Shutting down the government is a loser for the GOP: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/10/01/new-poll-shutting-down-the-government-is-a-loser-for-the-gop/
 NEW TODAY: Create Account for Affordable Health Coverage: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2013/08/19/new-create-account-for-affordable-health-coverage/
Copyright © 2013 The Progressive Pulse. All rights reserved.