Uncategorized

This week’s signs that the right has no interest in governing

Mel WattAt long last, we now know the official conservative litmus test for responding to nominations and other official proposals submitted to congress: “if the President is for something, we’re against it.”

It’s really as simple as that. And heaven help any nominees who happen to be women and/or people of color.

If the true nature of the test wasn’t already long-apparent in the right’s transparently hypocritical opposition to the federal version of Romney/Heritage Care (i.e. the Affordable Care Act), the final, once-and-for-all confirmation came yesterday when Senate Republicans successfully filibustered the nomination of Congressman Mel Watt to serve as head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency and then followed it up moments later with an equally absurd filibuster of the President’s nomination of a moderate, corporate lawyer named Patricia Millett to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

There was literally no good reason to oppose these nominations (except, maybe, that both nominees are too friendly to big business). Watt is a veteran attorney and respected and moderate voice with years of experience in the area in which he was to supervise.  What’s more, he has frequently worked closely with the banking industry — which plays such an important role in his hometown. According to one report, the successful filibuster marks the first time in 170 years that a sitting member of Congress has been denied such an appointment! He was even supported by Richard Burr.

Millett is an experienced corporate lawyer and the spouse of a military hero who has argued dozens of cases before the U.S. Supreme Court. She’s even a John Roberts fan! The only thing opponents could cook up was the ridiculous contention that — now, all of a sudden — that there are “too many judges on the D.C. Circuit.” The absurdity of this downright laughable argument probably explains why the GOP selected the grim-faced Senator Charles Grassley of Iowa (a man who has never been known to laugh in his life) to present it.

Word in D.C. is that talk of blowing up the filibuster is now gathering momentum once again. Let’s hope so.  Such an action is long overdue.

 

 

One Comment


  1. Alex

    November 2, 2013 at 10:15 am

    Why appoint a political hack with little or no housing experience to run a very complex agency that has caused this countryso many problems in the past ? This is where the financial crisis of 2008 started so why not get a seasoned professional in this position? !

Check Also

His words, not ours: Lt. Gov. Forest says he’s offering “reactionary commentary”

Since winning reelection last November, North Carolina Lt. ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The House unveiled pieces of its budget Thursday morning at various appropriation committee meetings [...]

A key House committee signed off on the chamber’s public school budget report Thursday, despite Demo [...]

Harold Brubaker, the former Republican House Speaker turned powerful lobbyist, tried to ram through [...]

A bill to limit local regulation of small cell towers is moving to a full House vote, despite concer [...]

The post Trumpcare confusion and Blue Cross Blue Shield’s latest rate hike appeared first on NC Poli [...]

The most shameful thing about the disastrous budget passed by the Senate two weeks ago is not the vi [...]

Court setbacks, public opinion, progressive activism and Trump bode ill for NC conservatives Profess [...]

So, the question as always comes down to one of vision. The elected chieftains who decide how much m [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more