Uncategorized

Needed: A public outcry for a more open and transparent court

As the 2014 North Carolina Supreme Court election campaigns get underway, concerns are mounting that contributions — especially by outside independent groups — will break all records, given the four slots open and the elimination of public financing.

And it’s not just the number that’s disturbing — it’s the influence that the money will have on the justices and how they might rule in any given case.

The recent “star chamber” bill that the General Assembly passed last summer, essentially allowing the justices to judge themselves, in private, when it comes to campaign cash conflicts of interest and other potential ethics issues, certainly doesn’t help.

After a number of scandals in Pennsylvania, the Supreme Court there recently adopted new recusal rules to clarify when judges must refrain from hearing cases due to campaign contributions from parties with an interest in the outcome of such cases.

As Billy Corriher from Think Progress writes here:

The rules demand that judges recuse themselves if a litigant, a lawyer, or a lawyer’s firm gave a contribution in “an amount that would raise a reasonable concern about the fairness or impartiality of the judge’s consideration.” Unfortunately, the rules do not specify an amount which would trigger mandatory recusal, but they are more specific than the rules in almost every other state.

Depending on how they are interpreted, Pennsylvania’s new rules could also include independent expenditures from outside groups that run ads supporting or attacking judicial candidates. The rules define “aggregate” contributions as those made “indirectly with the understanding that they will be used” for taking a position on a candidate.

Unfortunately, Corriher adds, while Pennsylvania moves towards greater transparency from its justices, courts elsewhere, especially in North Carolina, are moving towards more secrecy.

And change here won’t be coming from within the court, since some of the current justices pushed for the passage of the star chamber bill.

 

Check Also

State Supreme Court rules retroactive application of teacher tenure repeal is unconstitutional

The state Supreme Court ruled unanimously today that ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

State Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement refuses to disclose any details of probe into alle [...]

Senate favors form of merit selection for judges as alternative to House judicial redistricting bill [...]

North Carolinians hoping to find out who’s been funding Rep. Justin Burr’s crusade this legislative [...]

The SePro Corporation is receiving as much as $1.3 million in taxpayer money to chemically kill the [...]

In 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court infamously upheld the legality of racial segregation and “Jim Crow” [...]

900 million---amount in dollars of the cost of the tax cuts passed this year when they are fully in [...]

Mixed and confusing signals from NC GOPers on confederate monuments Senate President Pro Tem Phil Be [...]

Here is something you probably haven’t heard much lately, if at all, given the shocking news from Ch [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more