The latest numbers from Public Policy Polling  indicate only 30%  of voters approve of the way Governor Pat McCrory has handled North Carolina’s coal ash problems, compared to 44% who disapprove.
Frank Holleman, a senior attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center , says North Carolinians should be frustrated by the mixed messages and slow response from the McCrory administration in addressing the Dan River disaster and the safe storage of toxic ash at 14 other coal-fired power plants across North Carolina.
Gov. Pat McCrory has said that he wants Duke Energy to move its ash ponds away from drinking-water sources. But state environmental Sec. John Skvarla suggested last month that requiring Duke to move its coal ash away from North Carolina’s waterways might actually do more harm  than good.
“Until the governor’s own appointee begins to carry out the words that the governor has been speaking, I think all of our citizens have to question whether the governor really means what he’s saying,” said Holleman this week in an interview with NC Policy Watch.
Just this week, the governor avoided questions about whether his former employer should pay for the clean-up, saying he wants to “keep the politics out”  of that decision.
Seventy-nine percent of the respondents to the PPP poll believe Duke Energy should bear the cost of cleaning-up the coal ash ponds, not taxpayers and not its customers.
Holleman joins us this weekend on News & Views with Chris Fitzsimon to discuss what Duke Energy and the McCrory administration need to do about the Dan River coal ash spill. For a preview of that radio interview, click below.
Duke Energy  faces a March 15th deadline to present its response to the governor, laying out the options and costs for cleaning up the Dan.