Uncategorized

“Voter fraud” allegations premature

Be sure to check out this morning’s edition of Chris Fitzsimon’s “Monday numbers” column today in which he examines the politically-motivated rush to judgment by conservative lawmakers on the matter of recent “voter fraud” allegations. And in case you missed it, the Charlotte Observer had a good editorial on the subject over the weekend.

As both posts note, the breathless claims of Phil Berger and Thom Tillis are as off-base as the monster voter suppression law the two rammed through last year. This is from the editorial:

“’We have to ensure this is what happened, and it wasn’t an error on someone’s part,’” [State Board of Election Director Kim] Strach said.

She’s right – and after that, the state needs to determine when the possible fraud occurred and how it might be stopped. Sounds obvious, but that’s not how Republicans approached the issue of voter fraud before passing their restrictive voting law last year. If they had studied the problem, they would’ve learned that voter fraud rarely occurs at the polls. It happens during voter registration and with absentee ballots (as is likely with the last week’s cases). Then lawmakers could’ve crafted a law that addressed those problems with measures such as requiring new N.C. voters to provide a former address, so that they can contact other states and get the paperwork up to date.

The reason that kind of law never arrived: Republicans were hardly interested in making it harder to commit voter fraud. They wanted to make it harder for their opponents’ supporters to vote, so lawmakers required photo IDs and eliminated voting conveniences that Democrats largely took advantage of each election.

Now they may have backed into some cases of actual fraud. Or they may not have. As Strach completes her investigation, we’ll learn if and how and when double voting happened. Then legislators can do what they didn’t do last time – pass a law that stops people from voting illegally, instead of one that suppresses the legal ballots.”

Read more here: http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2014/04/05/4818326/nc-voter-fraud-or-maybe-not.html#.U0J9lK5B_4s#storylink=cpy

 

One Comment


  1. Jack

    April 7, 2014 at 9:57 am

    They love allegation as a way to pronounce guilt. They love to aside the investigative process and replace it with cries of “voter fraud” until it becomes real in the minds of their target voting audience. Its an old trick and it works on people who prefer their opinions chewed, digested and feed to them. As a result Phil Berger and Thom Tillis do a lot of chewing.

Check Also

Cooper continues winning streak against legislators; Judges grant TRO

In case you missed it earlier this evening, ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

With just a few hours left until the crossover deadline, the state of North Carolina’s environment i [...]

On Monday morning, there was only one way left to save the Court of Appeals and a few hours with whi [...]

The political compromise that repealed HB2 was enough for the NCAA and ACC, both of which have retur [...]

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

How many times do we have to say it? Well, it’s worth repeating – especially in the aftermath of rec [...]

As the national pundits weigh in on President Trump’s first 100 days in office and the General Assem [...]

How the General Assembly is spending “crossover week” and what it ought to be doing The last week of [...]

To casual observers, the recent controversy surrounding public school class-size mandates in grades [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more