Uncategorized

Editorial blasts “reckless” voucher push

This morning’s lead editorial in Raleigh’s News & Observer gets it right in its characterization of the push by state legislative leaders to plow ahead with their school voucher scheme despite the certainty of lengthy litigation over the issue and the existence of a court injunction against it:

“It really is time to stop calling those who run the N.C. General Assembly conservatives. They are not conservative. They are reckless.

There’s a long list of actions that demonstrates their disregard for what defines the truly conservative. They hand out extravagant amounts to the wealthy in tax cuts and leave the state strapped for basic services. They turn down billions of dollars in federal support for the jobless and the health needs of the working poor. They ignore the principles of sound investment by cutting spending on public schools and higher education. They trample constitutional ideals regarding voting rights and civil rights. They shirk their obligations to be careful stewards of the environment.

The list could go on, but the case is concisely illustrated in the latest turmoil over school vouchers.”

After explaining how the duo is trying to get the injunction overturned in spite of a letter from chief deputy attorney general Grayson Kelley that this would cause all kinds of unnecessary and potentially serious problems, the editorial concludes this way:

“Rather than accept the court’s order for a delay and Kelley’s concerns about going forward, the two Republican leaders are claiming that the injunction jeopardizes public funding for other state-supported education programs including private university scholarships, pre-kindergarten, Smart Start, aid to disabled and deaf children and Teach for America.

That is an extreme and alarmist reading of the injunction’s basis and a weak rationale for proceeding with vouchers without court approval. But on that basis, they’re willing to press for the launching of a potentially unconstitutional program at considerable cost and risk.

Reason and prudence would dictate a more cautious approach, but Tillis and Berger long ago showed they aren’t about being conservative.”

Amen. You can read the entire editorial by clicking here.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/04/14/3785059/tillis-berger-take-risky-path.html?sp=/99/108/#storylink=cpy

Check Also

Why have Tim Moore and Phil Berger turned their backs on this cause?

There are a lot of  substantive areas in ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The political compromise that repealed HB2 was enough for the NCAA and ACC, both of which have retur [...]

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

North Carolina’s largest public school system may be warning of “enormous disruptions” without speed [...]

Carol Turner hadn’t lived in North Carolina long before last November’s election. A retired nurse, s [...]

How many times do we have to say it? Well, it’s worth repeating – especially in the aftermath of rec [...]

As the national pundits weigh in on President Trump’s first 100 days in office and the General Assem [...]

How the General Assembly is spending “crossover week” and what it ought to be doing The last week of [...]

To casual observers, the recent controversy surrounding public school class-size mandates in grades [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more