Uncategorized

The obvious response to Duke’s new claims about the cost of coal ash clean-up

FF-coalAshNot that there isn’t good reason to doubt just about anything that Duke Energy spokespeople say when it comes to the recent coal ash disaster, but assuming that the claims advanced yesterday that full clean-up could cost $10 billion have any validity at all, here is one very obvious and concise response that those who care about the public interest might want to offer up:

“Yes, and your point?”

Seriously, did anyone think cleaning up the mess would be cheap or fast? We get it, Duke and we’ve gotten it for years. Your giant and massively profitable mega-corporation doesn’t want to spend any shareholder or fat cat executive dough on something as mundane and bothersome as cleaning up your own mess. Isn’t that special?

Well here’s the deal — or, at least what ought to be the deal: You claim it’s gonna take 30 years to do the job. Well let’s say you get real busy real quick and cut that number to 15 years. That’s about $666 million per year. Last year, Duke made a profit of $3 billion. With inflation and population growth that number figures to rise. This means that, at a maximum, the cost of clean-up adds up, roughly, to a modest hit on Duke profits of about 22% per year. Somehow, Duke will have to get by of profits of $2.34 billion per year instead of $3 billion. This hit might even be reduced further if company execs cut their compensation packages.

Hear this Duke bosses? It’s the world’s smallest violin playing just for you.

In other words, here’s what ought to be the bottom line response from North Carolina’s citizenry: Duke should be lucky if such a hit to its bottom line is the only ill that befalls the corporation.

Put even more simply: Stop whining and get to work.

One Comment


  1. Gloria

    April 23, 2014 at 9:58 pm

    Spot on.

Check Also

The hard and simple truth about the latest gerrymandered legislative maps

Raleigh politicos are all a dither today about ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

State Board of Elections & Ethics Enforcement refuses to disclose any details of probe into alle [...]

Senate favors form of merit selection for judges as alternative to House judicial redistricting bill [...]

North Carolinians hoping to find out who’s been funding Rep. Justin Burr’s crusade this legislative [...]

The SePro Corporation is receiving as much as $1.3 million in taxpayer money to chemically kill the [...]

Justices will hear Cooper v. Berger and Moore next week and the stakes couldn’t be much higher One o [...]

The post Monument to the ‘Party of Limited Government & Local Control’ appeared first on NC Poli [...]

In 1896, the U.S. Supreme Court infamously upheld the legality of racial segregation and “Jim Crow” [...]

900 million---amount in dollars of the cost of the tax cuts passed this year when they are fully in [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more