Uncategorized

Fracking bill moves forward, could see permits as soon as July 2015

Lawmakers passed a substitute piece of legislation Tuesday that carves out a path to allow the controversial method of drilling for natural gas to begin as soon as July 2015.

The bill, in a surprise move, was then rushed to a Senate Finance Committee hearing scheduled to begin at 5 p.m.

The proposed language for Senate Bill 786 got initial approval in the Senate Commerce Committee and will continue to move through the legislature.

A state Senator also temporarily restricting recordings of Tuesday’s meeting, resulting in the confiscation of one reporter’s recorder. Read more about that here.

Among the proposals discussed Tuesday afternoon were:

  • The mix of chemicals used in hydraulic fracking would remain a “trade secret” shielded from the public. First responders would find out what’s in those chemicals immediately after an emergency, and improper disclosure of the information would mean a low-level felony.
  • The newest version of the bill cuts back on the area oil and gas companies are liable if there’s water contamination nearing a drilling site. Tuesday’s bill cuts that to a half-mile radius of a wellhead, down from the nearly one-mile radius listed in 2011 legislation.
  • A whole host of studies are ordered up in the bill, from looking at whether a liquified natural gas (LNG) export facility is needed in North Carolina to how local community colleges can prepare future workers in the industry.
  • Local counties and cities won’t be able to ban, restrict or tax the drilling process.

Environmental groups like the Sierra Club criticized the new bill on several fronts, including setting a time table to issue permits before the lengthy rule-making process is completing and making the disclosure of the mix of chemicals used by companies a felony, a punitive punishment than what would exist for other disclosures of  business information.

“The theory behind protection of trade secrets is that disclosure hurts the company’s wallet and so there needs to be a means to recover economic damages that result, “said Dustin Chicurel-Bayard, communications director for the NC Sierra Club. “The theory behind this provision seems to be intimidation. This appears to be another special provision to protect companies like Halliburton at the expense of the public’s right to know.”

Below is an analysis from legislative staff of what the new language of the bill will do:

 

Pcs Fracking by NC Policy Watch

 

 

 

Check Also

UNC Board of Governors face protest, chooses new board chair and interim president

It was a busy day at the final ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

This story has been updated with comments from Jim Womack, who did not respond earlier to questions. [...]

For the 18 months, Gary Brown has been traveling through northeastern North Carolina like an itinera [...]

It will be at least another month before state Superintendent Mark Johnson can take over at the helm [...]

Eric Hall, in the midst of a rainy drive to rural Robeson County to pitch North Carolina’s ambitious [...]

5---number of days since Senators Bill Cassidy and Lindsey Graham unveiled a new proposal to repeal [...]

The post The stench of hate speech appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When a Navy recruiter visited his high school, Carlos was among those students eager to sign up. In [...]

Website with ties to Civitas Institute promotes anti-Semitic attack on Attorney General Stein There [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more