- The Progressive Pulse - http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org -
Three problems with the Hobby Lobby decision
Posted By Michael Dise On July 1, 2014 @ 11:47 am In Uncategorized | Comments Disabled
1. The unconstitutional application of religious liberty: The original purpose of religious liberty is defined as the separation of church and state, ensuring the protection of both through mutual autonomy. Health care coverage is an entity of the state. By permitting Hobby Lobby the refusal to cover certain forms of birth control on religious grounds in its female employees’ health care plans, the Supreme Court is essentially giving the same blessing of religious liberty to a corporate entity that the law permits for private faith. Based on such reasoning, a company run by Jehovah’s Witnesses could write blood transfusions out of their health care plans and companies run by fundamentalist Christians could write vaccines out of theirs.
2. Blatant hypocrisy: Hobby Lobby’s excuse to refuse coverage for certain forms of women’s birth control was framed as religious opposition to what they falsely named “abortion”–specific contraceptives and devices that prevent a zygote from being implanted in the uterine wall. However, as noted by Mother Jones in a recent investigation , Hobby Lobby has financial ties not only to the manufacturing of said forms of birth control but even to drugs used for inducing abortions. Hobby Lobby has stock holdings in companies that manufacture these products. This is blatant hypocrisy and reveals that the true motive wasn’t religious conviction at all but corporate greed.
3. It’s counterproductive: As noted by pro-life progressive and faith activist Brian McLaren in a recent article , the Hobby Lobby decision–while being hailed as a victory against abortion by many in conservative Christian faith communities–is actually counterproductive to such a cause in that it does nothing to reduce or prevent real abortions. In fact, by making it more financially difficult for female employees to acquire birth control that, scientifically, does not constitute abortion, Hobby Lobby is eliminating assistance that would actually reduce abortions. Hence, the decision is not in any way a victory against abortion. To the contrary, it deceives Hobby Lobby’s religious supporters into making abortion a more viable option through the withdrawal of financial support for significant forms of birth control such as emergency contraception.
Article printed from The Progressive Pulse: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org
URL to article: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/07/01/three-problems-with-the-hobby-lobby-decision/
URLs in this post:
 Image: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Hobby-Lobby.jpg
 as noted by Mother Jones in a recent investigation: http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/04/hobby-lobby-retirement-plan-invested-emergency-contraception-and-abortion-drug-makers
 As noted by pro-life progressive and faith activist Brian McLaren in a recent article: http://www.faithstreet.com/onfaith/2014/06/30/q-what-did-hobby-lobby-win-a-many-more-abortions/32774
 Hobby Lobby: The best eight lines from Justice Ginsburg’s dissent : http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/06/30/hobby-lobby-the-best-eight-lines-from-justice-ginsburgs-dissent/
 Hobby Lobby wins and women’s health loses at Supreme Court : http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/06/30/hobby-lobby-wins-and-womens-health-loses-at-supreme-court/
 Why Courts Matter: Sen. Burr blue slip watch Day 280 : http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/03/26/why-courts-matter-richard-burr-blue-slip-watch-day-280/
 Texas judge takes it to proponents of state’s restrictive abortion law : http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/09/04/texas-judge-takes-it-to-proponents-of-states-restrictive-abortion-law/
Copyright © 2014 The Progressive Pulse. All rights reserved.