- The Progressive Pulse - http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org -
Lawyers are game changers for immigrant children
Posted By Sharon McCloskey On July 16, 2014 @ 10:01 am In Uncategorized | Comments Disabled
As we reported  last week, many of the children crossing the border into the United States wind up in court defending themselves — a situation that presumably does not end well for them.
The American Civil Liberties Union describes the plight of such children in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Seattle against Attorney General Eric Holder, seeking an order requiring that counsel be appointed for children in immigration court:
Plaintiffs are eight immigrant children, ranging in age from ten to seventeen. The Government has begun proceedings to deport each of them; they will soon be called to appear before an Immigration Judge. In court, the Department of Homeland Security will be represented by a trained lawyer who will argue for the child’s deportation. But no lawyer will stand with the child. Each will be required to respond to the charges against him or her, and, in theory, will be afforded an opportunity to make legal arguments and present evidence on his or her own behalf. But in reality those rights will be meaningless because children are not competent to exercise them. Each child has attempted to find representation through pro bono legal service providers, but none of them have found anyone with the resources to take on their cases. Absent this Court’s intervention, these children will be forced to defend themselves pro se under the immigration laws – a legal regime that, as the courts have recognized, rivals the Internal Revenue Code in its complexity.
Numbers released yesterday by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse (TRAC) at Syracuse University show as expected that represented children fare much better.
Among the conclusions in that report :
Children were not represented about half of the time (48%) they appeared in Immigration Court, although there is wide variation by state and hearing location.
Outcome if attorney present. In almost half (47%) of the cases in which the child was represented, the court allowed the child to remain in the United States. The child was ordered removed in slightly more than one in four (28%) of these cases. And in the remaining quarter (26%) the judge entered a “voluntary departure” (VD) order. (While with a VD order the child is required to leave the country, the child avoids many of the more severe legal consequences of a removal order.)
Outcome if no attorney. Where the child appeared alone without representation, nine out of ten children were ordered deported — 77 percent through the entry of a removal order, and 13 percent with a VD order. One in ten (10%) were allowed to remain in the country.
Article printed from The Progressive Pulse: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org
URL to article: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/07/16/lawyers-are-game-changers-for-immigrant-children/
URLs in this post:
 reported: http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/07/11/do-something-about-the-immigration-crisis-billionaires-tell-congress/
 lawsuit : http://legalactioncenter.org/sites/default/files/Counsel%20Complaint.pdf
 report: http://trac.syr.edu/immigration/reports/359/
 New guidelines ensure all students have access to public education, regardless of their immigration status : http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/05/16/new-guidelines-ensure-all-students-have-access-to-public-education-regardless-of-their-immigration-status/
 Federal government website directly refutes McCrory’s claims about refugee kids : http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/08/05/federal-government-website-directly-refutes-mccrorys-claims-about-refugee-kids/
 Waiting for Bostic? : http://pulse.ncpolicywatch.org/2014/06/19/waiting-for-bostic/
Copyright © 2014 The Progressive Pulse. All rights reserved.