Uncategorized

Editorial: Apply common sense on ACA subsidies

This morning’s Greensboro News & Record makes some sound points in assessing the split in the federal courts over the Affordable Care Act and the availability of subsidies in states without state-based exchanges.

While the editorial (which is entitled “Save the subsidies”) acknowledges the ambiguity of some of the language in the statute, it also rightfully calls for judges and lawmakers to apply common sense in interpreting and applying it.

As it notes:

“Yet, it [the inartfully crafted statute] could be fixed easily. Congress could pass a technical correction, making plain its original intent that subsidies should be made available across the country. Republicans won’t agree to that, preferring to see the program collapse.

North Carolina could provide a remedy for its residents, creating a state exchange and allowing them to sign up again for coverage. Our state’s Republicans won’t do that, for the same reason. They would rather stick to their opposition, even if more than 300,000 residents lose their medical coverage. It’s all about politics.

For now, after Tuesday’s contradictory rulings, the legal question is still open. Politics seems to influence the courts as well. The three judges on the Richmond panel were appointed by Democratic presidents. The two who produced the majority opinion in Washington were nominated by Republican presidents. If the full D.C. court hears the case on appeal, a reversal is expected because most of the court’s judges are Democratic appointees.

It would be refreshing to see a ruling made on the legal merits of a case, rather than politics.

Also helpful would be consideration for what’s really best for the public. The ACA intends to improve access to medical care. Whether the enrollment mechanism is a federal or state exchange shouldn’t matter, and judges should apply common sense to their final decision.

Read the entire editorial by clicking here.

 

 

 

4 Comments


  1. Alex

    July 25, 2014 at 10:12 am

    Laws are never judged on “common sense”. If that was the case, we would have repealed the ACA from the very beginning. Why else would we have changed it and delayed many parts of it at least a 100 times ?

  2. ML

    July 25, 2014 at 10:20 am

    Other than the warren court the Supreme Court has been a poor place for common sense. Would be nice if they did exhibit a little from time to time.

  3. love my state

    July 25, 2014 at 11:42 am

    can’t understand why we don’t want everyone to have healthcare coverage. makes no sense at all.

  4. Alex

    July 27, 2014 at 7:55 am

    When we give health insurance to a select group, the rest of the taxpayers have to pay for it in addition to paying their own insurance. That’s what people object to.

Check Also

Justice Center: Trump’s transgender ban consistent with his “cruel and exclusionary view of the world”

The North Carolina Justice Center — parent organization ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

This is the first of a two-part story. Tomorrow, NCPW will report on the findings of UNC marine scie [...]

Members of North Carolina’s State Board of Education passed down $2.5 million in legislative cuts Tu [...]

North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein’s most important job is to keep people safe. For the Depa [...]

When Gov. Roy Cooper visits Wilmington on Monday, it's unlikely that he will be greeted by the [...]

It is not just health care for 30 million people at stake these days. Democracy is hanging by a thre [...]

President Trump and others in Washington have recently proposed doing away with the longstanding bar [...]

The destructive delusions in the Right’s opposition to public transit The modern day conservative op [...]

The post GenX & ’emerging contaminants’ appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more