News

Closing the achievement gap: Study finds black UNC students benefited from hands-on classes

The achievement gap between black and white students was narrowed in college classes that stressed “active learning” over lectures, according to a study published this week by a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill professor.

hogan-kelly-200X250

Dr. Kelly Hogan Source: UNC-Chapel Hill

The New York Times had this article yesterday about the study conducted by UNC biology professor Kelly Hogan and Sarah Eddy of the University of Washington at Seattle.

The study found freshman students who were black or whose parents didn’t attend college had test scores rise (by an average of six points) when students took an introductory biology class taught through interactive methods — teamwork, in-class activities and online quizzes – over a class taught via lectures.

Hogan found that black students cut the achievement gap in half when in classes that stressed more hands-on activities, and first-generation students saw gaps between themselves and other students disappear.

From the New York Times article:

The study, published Tuesday in the journal CBE Life Sciences Education, looked at six semesters of an introductory biology class at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, taken mostly by freshmen. Three terms took a more traditional, lecture-based approach, and three demanded more participation by students. The classes averaged almost 400 students, and were taught by Dr. Hogan.

The more active approach gave students more in-class activities, often done in teams, including sets of online exercises. There were similar online exercises assigned to be completed before class along with textbook reading, intended to force students to think about the material rather than just memorize it, and still others for review after a lesson. Many of the exercises were ungraded, but the instructor could tell whether students had done them.

The active strategy, Dr. Hogan said, left less time for lecturing and made much of the traditional lecture moot, anyway. It helped students get more out of the reading — and, crucially, made it much harder for them to skip the reading.

“In a traditional lecture course, they’re not held accountable for being prepared for class, and they really don’t need to be, because an instructor is going to tell them everything he or she wants them to know,” Dr. Hogan said. “Would you read a report for a meeting if you knew your boss was going to spend 15 minutes summarizing it for you? I know I wouldn’t.”

To read the entire news article, click here. The study itself can be read here.

Hogan also spoke about her work in closing the achievement gap for disadvantaged students in this 2012 video.

 

Check Also

UNC Board of Governors face protest, chooses new board chair and interim president

It was a busy day at the final ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The UNC Board of Governors is holding its last meeting of 2017 Friday, where the latest of its many [...]

Just south of Candler off the Pisgah Highway is a lovely piece of property on Little Piney Mountain [...]

Veteran North Carolina education policy expert Kris Nordstrom has authored a new and vitally importa [...]

When Joni Robbins, a section chief in the N.C. Department of Public Instruction, closes bidding next [...]

“All speech is free, but some speech is more free than others.” This seems to be the motto of the cu [...]

Trumpists prepare to raze another vital common good law It’s hard to keep up these days with the flo [...]

The post That’s how ‘Humbug’ is done appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

The solid citizens of Johnston County, N.C. – in a fateful quirk of geography – for several years ha [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more