Commentary

Jim Crow 2.0: Berger’s “religious freedom” bill

Greensboro News & Record columnist Susan Ladd does a great job of skewering state Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger’s ridiculous “religious freedom” for magistrates legislation today in this essay.

“It’s appalling that the first order of business for our state legislature would be to reinstate Jim Crow. Or should we call it James Crow? Jane Crow? Jim Crow 2.0?

Discrimination by any name smells just as sour.

But discrimination is precisely what the bill introduced Wednesday by state Sen. Phil Berger (R-Rockingham) allows. Currently titled the Magistrates Recusal of Civil Ceremonies, the bill falls under the general heading of “religious freedom” laws sweeping the country after the legalization of same-sex marriage in many states.”

She goes on:

“Though this bill is narrower in scope than ‘religious freedom’ laws that have been attempted in other states, it still legislates discrimination and limits the rights of groups that could be targeted by a religious objection….

Because this bill doesn’t specify, however, magistrates presumably would be free to recuse themselves from performing other marriages that violated their religious beliefs. Religion is a very malleable thing, having been used to object to all kinds of practices. But let’s take an obvious case.

A magistrate opposed to interracial marriage simply could cite the passage used by the Virginia circuit court judge in 1959, when he convicted Richard and Mildred Loving of the crime of interracial marriage.”

Here’s the excellent conclusion:

“The state, at the behest of Berger, already is wasting taxpayers’ dollars fighting in the courts to reinstate Amendment One, with little to no chance of success. Now he’s proposing another unconstitutional law that also very likely would be overturned after a court battle at taxpayers’ expense.

The state spent at least $1.2 million in taxpayers’ money last year on private attorneys to fight battles that normally would reside with the attorney general’s office. Attorney General Roy Cooper said last year he no longer would oppose challenges to the state’s gay marriage ban.

Meanwhile, more than 255,000 North Carolinians need a job. Schools are desperately underfunded. Hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians have no health care because the state has refused to expand Medicaid. The state is facing a $200 million budget shortfall that could increase.

And still Berger keeps fiddling away while the flames grow higher.”

Click here to read the entire op-ed.

2 Comments


  1. Laurie

    January 30, 2015 at 8:20 am

    At this point Berger etal are in gross violation of their fiduciary duties.

  2. LayintheSmakDown

    February 3, 2015 at 8:40 pm

    I find it quite disturbing that there is this much hate directed at someone else’s beliefs. So you tell me that religious views which are actually outlined in the Constitution are to be overlooked and someones sexuality should take precedence. A sad day in NC for sure.

Check Also

NC faith leaders call for action on neglected policy proposals

In case you missed it, be sure to ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Firebrand conservative academic opts for early retirement in light of latest controversies and provo [...]

While the North Carolina General Assembly tries again and again to reopen gyms and bars, there is an [...]

GenX study shows contamination in 80% of wells tested; mice studies show liver damage from Nafion By [...]

Black North Carolinians express hopes and fears about the struggle against racism in America “You ar [...]

It’s never safe to predict what the current leadership of the North Carolina General Assembly will d [...]

The post The Room Where It Happened appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

In 1980, I moved to San Francisco, living in a collective in an old Victorian in Haight-Ashbury. Sit [...]

For many Americans, the initial reactions to seeing images on the news (or even occasionally in an A [...]