CHARLOTTE – The University of North Carolina’s Board of Governors opted Friday to eliminate an academic center concentrated on poverty and run by a controversial professor.
The Board of Governors, meeting on the campus of the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, voted unanimously to accept recommendations to shut down three centers on three different campuses – the Center for Biodiversity at East Carolina University, the Institute for Civic Engagement and Social Change at N.C. Central University and the Center on Poverty, Work and Opportunity at UNC-Chapel Hill.
Student protestors, who came to the meeting in Charlotte from several different campuses, nearly shut down the meeting.
Friday’s meeting also included a vote to allow campuses to raise tuition and fees over the next two years at its campuses, cost increases that range from 2 to 7 percent for in-state students. (Click here to read a previous post about this.)
The five-month review of centers and institutes, conducted at the behest of the Republican-led state legislature, looked at 240 centers on the 16 university campuses in the UNC systems. The university system leaders may opt to further evaluate nine marine science centers at various UNC campuses at a later date.
The resolution passed Friday makes clear that the three centers singled out for closure will be shut down by this summer and negates an effort, largely led by UNC-Chapel Hill faculty, to urge Chancellor Carol Folt to keep the poverty center open.
Folt told the UNC Board of Governors that many on her campus view their actions as an attempt at suppressing academic freedoms.
“They’ve very fearful this decision [will have] a chilling effect,” Folt said.
The vote Friday to eliminate the poverty center came after student protesters interrupted the university’s governing board in the course of the meeting, leading chants of “This is what democracy looks like!” and “Shut it down!”
UNC Board Chair John Fennebresque called for a recess and then moved the university governing board’s meeting to a smaller room to hold its vote on the future of centers and institutes, keeping out students and other members of the public from coming in. Members of the press were allowed into the meeting room, and audio and video of the meeting was streamed to an adjoining room to comply with open meeting laws.
The elimination of the Poverty Center, in particular, brought accusations from faculty, students and others that it was an attempt to silence Gene Nichol*, the director of the Chapel Hill poverty center, who has rankled Republican leaders for his newspaper editorials lambasting largely Republican politicians for policies he attests ignore the plights of the poor. All of the 32-members of the UNC Board of Governors have received appointments from a state legislature dominated by Republicans.
State Sen. Bob Rucho, a powerful Republican from Mecklenburg County, was at Friday’s meeting and told N.C. Policy Watch that he attended because the university’s board of governors was meeting near his district, and not because of the vote on centers and institutes.
In recent years, groups like the conservative Civitas Institute, funded largely through former state budget Art Pope’s family foundation, have urged lawmakers and the board of governors to shut down Nichol’s poverty center. The Civitas Institute attracted attention last year for its 2013 public records request to review thousands of Nichol’s emails and correspondence.
In a statement issued after the vote, Nichol , a tenured law professor, said that he has since been approached by other funders to create a poverty research fund at the law school to continue his work. Nichol did not attend Friday’s meeting.
But the decision Friday to eliminate the poverty center was an affront to the First Amendment and academic freedom, Nichol said, and the board of governors actions amounted to a “profound, partisan, and breathtakingly shortsighted abuse of power.”
“The Board’s laughable charade of independent, merit-based ‘centers review’ has fooled no one,” Nichol wrote. “Dishonest censorship is no improvement over straightforward suppression.”
Hannah Gage, an emeritus member of the UNC Board of Governors, told the board during Friday’s meeting that voting to eliminate specific centers at campuses was a worrisome departure from previous boards that left chancellors and trustees to make campus-level decisions.
“We are crossing a new line when we make these recommendations,” said Gage, who serves in an emeritus capacity on the Board of Governors, and is not a voting member of the board.
Centers will also need an annual review on the campus level, with a more comprehensive evaluation every five years of all centers. It also reiterates existing university system policies on advocacy and political participation limits.
Jim Holmes, who chaired the group reviewing centers, said that though the three centers singled out for elimination may align with liberal policies, that wasn’t the intention.
“It is a coincidence,” Holmes said, in comments he made to reporters following Friday’s meeting. “There was no targeting.”
And when asked the specific reason why the poverty center was eliminated, Holmes responded that it wasn’t what the academic centers did, but that the trio slated for closure didn’t lend to having a stand-alone center.
“They didn’t need a center structure to exist,” he said.
Note: Gene Nichol served on the board of the N.C. Justice Center, an anti-poverty non-profit that N.C. Policy Watch is a part of, until the end of 2014. Nichol had no role in the reporting or writing of this post.