Commentary

Another disturbing message in Lt. Gov Forest’s charter school bullying

Dan ForestThere have been lots of excellent critiques of Lt. Gov. Dan Forest’s recent Soviet-style demands for a rewrite of a report on the not-so-impressive performance of North Carolina’s charter schools. My colleague Chris Fitzsimon authored one of the best last Friday when he rightfully blasted Forest for trying to rewrite history to abet his ideological objective of privatizing and dismantling public education:

“Forest delayed the report, saying it was too negative toward charters and called it the fuel the media uses to criticize what Republicans are doing.

In other words, the facts show that charter schools are less diverse than traditional public schools and Forest is worried about that the public will think when the media reports it.

Maybe the answer is to be more thoughtful about expanding charter schools without enough accountability and Forest wouldn’t have anything to hide.

Ironically, Forest’s refusal to accept the publicly presented report probably gave it more attention than it would have received in the media had he not objected.

And facts are not fuel. They are facts whether Forest likes them or not.

He can disagree with the report if he wants, maybe try to make up his own facts, but the report is the report and charter schools are less diverse than traditional public schools.”

Here, however, is another less publicized, but equally troubling aspect of Forest’s actions: the loud and clear message it sends to honest, hardworking employees in all parts of government that they had better toe the ideological line.

Think about what happened: Some dedicated public employees generated a “just the facts” report on charter schools. Unfortunately for them, the facts weren’t what a prominent and ambitious state politician wanted to hear about. Now, they are being hounded into producing a new report with “additional findings.”

As Charlotte Observer education reporter Ann Doss Helms reported this morning:

“If you want people to notice a data report, try having a public official object to it.

That’s one lesson from last week’s decision by the N.C. Board of Education to send a charter school report back for revisions after Lt. Gov. Dan Forest complained that it wasn’t positive enough….

He and other state officials stood by the numbers. But Levinson said he’ll look for ways to highlight successes by the independently-run charter schools, such as adding a list of awards and accolades they’ve won.”

This is a dreadful example of politically and ideologically motivated interference in the kind of straightforward, non-ideological, non-political fact finding that citizens should demand and have a right to expect from their public servants. And while, such an occurrence is hardly unprecedented, the blatancy of this incident is so egregious that it will clearly have a chilling effect throughout state government going forward.

What’s more, don’t think for a moment that Forest and his ideological allies aren’t fully aware of this reality.

2 Comments


  1. Bill Bush

    January 13, 2016 at 2:56 pm

    If they want to have the charter schools look better, they will just have to do better. It is not easy unless you can cherrypick your students. Oh, yeah, that’s sorta what they indirectly do. I remember hearing a charter school parent years ago bragging that misbehavers were sent “back to public school” as though that were a positive accomplishment, and not an abandonment of a student who needed help with social skills or who was perhaps acting out in response to issues outside of school.

    I spent too many years working for my public school students to succeed to have any patience for the current “movement” which is really a “movement” of tax dollars to de facto private schools.

  2. Tim McTyler

    January 22, 2016 at 12:55 am

    Charter schools do look better in general, for a variety of reasons. How do you indirectly cherry pick students? As a charter school parent for over 15 collective years I’ve never seen a single case of anyone bragging that “misbehavers” were sent “back to public school”. Bill’s comment displays a pretty uninformed lack of understanding regarding how NC charter schools function in the 21st century. If anything, I’ve seen parents, teachers, administrators, and students rally behind at-risk kids and difficult situations. I’ve seen cases where kids made remarkably poor choices and the charter school and support family solved the problems. I’ve never, not once, not ever, seen a child sent “back to public school” assuming that means traditional public school or anywhere else.

Check Also

NC Policy Watch to host Charlotte Crucial Conversation on future of school integration

Join us Wednesday, October 30 for a very ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

In 39 days, some children and teenagers under the age of 18 will no longer be charged in the adult c [...]

Common Cause released a report today that shows drawing electoral boundaries using only data for cit [...]

Recurring low-performing schools can get fresh starts under the state’s Restart school reform model, [...]

North Carolina Republicans are using procedural arguments to dismiss the relevance of the U.S. House [...]

In any discussion of North Carolina politics and policy debates, it’s hard to overstate the footprin [...]

The post The Spineless Dead-Horseman appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When the journalist Michael Kinsley wrote in 1984 that a gaffe “is when a politician tells the truth [...]

Tonight's Democratic presidential debate will be dominated by two urgent issues: the House of R [...]