Commentary, Special Session

Independent State Chief Information Officer bill could block administrative policies, programs

Amidst the flurry of activity at the General Assembly special session this morning is a less flashy but nonetheless vital bill, HB6, which would massively reorganize the digital backbone of state government. The proposal has not received a great deal of attention, but could have far-reaching consequences.

HB6 – Independent State CIO – would create an independent Department of Information Technology (DIT), headed by a nominee of the Lt. Governor and confirmed by the General Assembly. DIT has the power to oversee IT functions across state government, including:

  • “Approve selection of respective agency chief information officers.”
  • Review IT appropriations and expenditures for each State agency.
  • Compel agencies to report on IT “assets, systems, personnel, and projects.”
  • Determine how IT “assets, systems, and personnel are provided and distributed among agencies.”

It remains unclear what problem HB6 addresses or how this bill is the answer. However, given the importance of IT to all functions of state government, an independent CIO could effectively block administrative priorities and programs.

HB6 raises some crucial questions without offering any clear solutions to an existing issue. How many other states don’t give a gubernatorial appointee the authority to coordinate IT functions across state government? Could this change create additional IT costs that would take away from other state needs? How many other state agencies are headed by a nominee of the Lieutenant Governor and confirmed by the General Assembly? For that matter, how many private companies would prevent the Chief Executive Officer from overseeing the Chief Information Officer?

Even if there are reasons to look at how IT functions are coordinated across state government, effective reform requires a great deal more assessment and reflection than has been allowed thus far.

One Comment


  1. William Hollar

    December 15, 2016 at 8:42 pm

    Privatize IT functions, with costs automatically included in Governor’s Budget, as a model for privatizing other departments?
    e.g., http://alecexposed.org/w/images/e/e2/9A11-Electronic_Government_Services_Act_Exposed.pdf

    Q: Is this just bad writing, or does it make DHHS, DENR, DoR etc. independent?
    § 143B-6. Principal departments; other executive branch departments.
    (a) Principal Departments. – Except as provided by subsection (b) of this section, in
    addition to the principal departments…..
    (b) Other Departments. – In addition to the principal departments enumerated in
    subsection (a) of this section, these other executive branch departments shall act independently of
    the Governor and General Assembly, under the sole authority of the designated department head:

Check Also

President Trump reveals the small-minded beliefs behind his immigration agenda, again

If you’ve already thrown your neck out shaking ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Any protection the courts offer Dreamers is temporary, but all eyes are on the U.S. Supreme Court to [...]

The good news is that the levels of GenX in Wilmington’s drinking water is testing consistently belo [...]

This week NC Child and the NC Institute of Medicine release the 2018 Child Health Report Card, an an [...]

North Carolina’s public school system is one of the lowest funded in the nation when adjusted for co [...]

In “Lessons on political speech, academic freedom, and university governance from the new North Caro [...]

Cracks are forming in the NRA’s death grip on American politics At some point, it’s going to happen. [...]

As the General Assembly wraps up its weirdly timed and generally ill-conceived winter session, it wo [...]

The post Dumb & Dumber & Dumbest appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]