Courts & the Law, News

Federal judge agrees to delay Medicaid expansion litigation

A federal judge on Friday agreed to temporarily halt litigation related to Gov. Roy Cooper’s attempts to expand Medicaid.

The stay will expire March 31, at which time the state and federal Department of Health and Human Services will be required to respond to the original complaint, and Republican legislators who filed that complaint will have to inform the court if a dispute still exists.

House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger filed the lawsuit earlier this month against the state and federal Department of Health and Human Services to stop Cooper from expanding Medicaid altogether. They were granted a temporary restraining order, which was granted but still a point of dispute before the court after defendants filed a motion to vacate the order.

Earlier this week, Moore and Berger filed a joint motion along with the federal Department of Health and Human Services (which is now under President Donald Trump’s control) to delay litigation for 60 days so that the new presidential administration could evaluate the issues of the case.

It was explained in that motion that the federal department agreed with the legislators not to process any request from North Carolina to expand Medicaid for 89 days.

The state department asked the federal court to dismiss the case altogether for lack of jurisdiction because it’s a state issue.

Judge Louise Wood Flanagan said in her order to delay litigation that the stay hinges on the following:

  1. Unless some objection be raised within seven days hereof causing the court to alter this determination, defendants’ response deadline to the complaint is March 31, 2017, which also is the deadline for the parties’ report alerting as to what disputes if any remain, and such other matters as the parties determine efficient to report;
  2. Should a defendant file a responsive motion in advance of the March 31, 2017, deadline, unless good cause be shown within seven days of service of the motion why response, if any, to said motion should be delayed, response shall be due in the regular course, subject to the court’s local civil rules concerning motions practice;
  3. Any response by the federal defendants to plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction shall be due no later than April 7, 2017. The state defendants shall have five days within which to comment on the record upon their co- defendants’ submission. Then, plaintiffs shall have five days to make their reply to defendants; and
  4. The state defendants shall file a copy of any proposal indicating date of the federal defendants’ receipt of same with the court.

One Comment


  1. Sylvia Freeman

    January 28, 2017 at 11:34 am

    I just don’t get why anyone is against expanding Medicaid. It only helps many residents of our state.

Check Also

HB2 appeal seeking transgender protections voluntarily dismissed; litigation in lower court over law still pending

All parties to litigation over House Bill 2 ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

North Carolina’s largest public school system may be warning of “enormous disruptions” without speed [...]

Carol Turner hadn’t lived in North Carolina long before last November’s election. A retired nurse, s [...]

Controversy over class-size requirements in early grades has emerged as the biggest issue facing Nor [...]

The wisdom of the plan by Senate leaders to cut taxes by $839 million was called into question this [...]

Several years of tax cuts have not fixed our economic problems, and more of the same won’t either In [...]

Progress on “second chance” agenda marks a rare positive development in state policy wars There are [...]

24 million---the number of people in the United States who would lose health care coverage by 2026 u [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more