Environment, Trump Administration

While more money needed for chemical research, Trump sets out to slash EPA budget, workforce

Coming to a river near you: Chemicals, lots of chemicals (Photo: Joe Sullivan, Flickr, Creative Commons license)

As a planet, we are awash in 10s of millions of synthetic chemicals: They are infused in hormones and perfumes, weed killers and wood turpentine, flame retardants and freon. These synthetics are damaging ecosystems, including waterways, where chemicals are changing the sex of fish.

Unfortunately, while industry has been churning more than 100 million synthetic chemicals in the last 60 years, few scientists and fewer dollars have been devoted to researching the harm these chemicals are wreaking on the environment. And that comparatively puny amount of federal research dollars could soon nearly, if not completely, disappear.

A new study published by researchers at the Duke University Nicholas School of the Environment concludes that the lack of funding and knowledge have translated to a “critical blindspot” in understanding how chemicals are changing global ecology.

From the study’s announcement:

“When compared to climate change and nutrient pollution, synthetic chemicals have fallen off the research radar — despite the threats they pose to human and environmental health. Right now, we lack the data needed to assess the ecological impacts of most of the synthetic chemicals in use today. The situation is unsustainable.”

A second study shows that the amount of EPA funding devoted to this type of research has drastically declined since 2001 — from 1.3 percent of the agency’s research and development budget to just 0.5 percent. This decline has occurred despite the National Academy of Science recommendations that the portion be boosted to 15 to 20 percent.

The worse news? The Trump administration is strongly considering slashing the EPA budget by $1 billion, about 12 percent of its $8 billion annual budget, and its staff by two-thirds — from 15,000 people to just 5,000. More chilling is that Trump wants require all EPA science to be vetted by political staffers.

Check Also

In delaying recommendation, Duke University subcommittee concerned about “credibility” problem with new natural gas plant

For a university that has always been protective of ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Conference comes a day after new report lauds benefits of same-day registration The new line-up for [...]

North Carolina’s largest public school system may be warning of “enormous disruptions” without speed [...]

Carol Turner hadn’t lived in North Carolina long before last November’s election. A retired nurse, s [...]

Controversy over class-size requirements in early grades has emerged as the biggest issue facing Nor [...]

The wisdom of the plan by Senate leaders to cut taxes by $839 million was called into question this [...]

Several years of tax cuts have not fixed our economic problems, and more of the same won’t either In [...]

Progress on “second chance” agenda marks a rare positive development in state policy wars There are [...]

24 million---the number of people in the United States who would lose health care coverage by 2026 u [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more