Environment, Trump Administration, Uncategorized

Today in Trumpland: Dems boycott Pruitt nomination for EPA + UNC panel deals with political influence over enviro policy

Scott Pruitt, nominee for EPA administrator (Photo: Oklahoma Attorney General’s office)

Senate Democrats boycotted a final committee meeting on EPA nominee Scott Pruitt today, stalling a vote on the controversial attorney general of Oklahoma. In addition to his deep ties to the fossil fuel industry, as AG, Pruitt  sued the EPA more than a dozen times over what he considered federal overreach.

And to be filed under You Can’t Make This Up: The Washington Post quoted Sen. Joni Ernst, an Iowa Republican, as saying: “I ask my Democratic colleagues: Will they take the blame for an EPA that is not fully informational? God forbid we have an environmental crisis.”

Shortly after President Trump was inaugurated, he imposed an information and media blackout on the EPA. The website could not be changed; official social media accounts were suspended, prompting a spate of Alt EPA and Alt NASA and Alt National Parks Service Twitter accounts.

As for Ernst’s concerns about an environmental crisis, the Trump administration has also called for a gutting of EPA funding and staff, which would leave the agency practically impotent to deal with any such disaster. A Florida congressman went so far as to file a bill disbanding the EPA altogether.

From the WaPo story:

As one after another lawmaker spoke, a GOP aide displayed a chart designed to show how quickly past EPA nominees had been confirmed. Notably missing from it, however, was President Barack Obama’s second EPA administrator, Gina McCarthy. Nominated in March 2013, she was not confirmed until July of that year — and at one point, committee Republicans boycotted a meeting to demand that McCarthy answer more questions.

For more insight into what we can expect for the environment and science under a Trump presidency and in North Carolina, the Roy Cooper administration, UNC Gillings School of Public Health is livestreaming a panel discussion today on that very topic.

What’s the Future for 2017: How Elections Influence Science and Environmental Policy” begins at 1:15 p.m. Speakers include Kelly Kryc, former senior policy analyst for the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy; David Goldston, director of government affairs at the Natural Resources Defense Council; Jason West, associate professor, UNC Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering; and Jennifer Mundt, senior legislative analyst, North Carolina General Assembly.

 

Check Also

Under proposed billboard legislation, outdoor advertising companies have more property rights than people living near hog farms

O n the way to the beach along ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Monday that the North Carolina GOP drew unconstitutionally racially ger [...]

As the N.C. House puts together its budget this week, the same thought is on the minds of representa [...]

Wednesday was the 63rd anniversary of the Brown v. Board of Education ruling, the milestone U.S. Sup [...]

Court setbacks, public opinion, progressive activism and Trump bode ill for NC conservatives Profess [...]

So, the question as always comes down to one of vision. The elected chieftains who decide how much m [...]

2.8 billion---amount in dollars of needs in communities across the state for rebuilding efforts from [...]

The post Crumbs appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

Trump + North Carolina
In dozens of vitally important areas, policy decisions of the Trump administration are dramatically affecting and altering the lives of North Carolinians. This growing collection of stories summarizes and critiques many of the most important decisions and their impacts.
Read more


HB2 - The continuing controversy
Policy Watch’s comprehensive coverage of North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBT law.
Read more