Environment, News

In Wilson, media shut out of FERC public listening session on Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Welcome, except for the media. Reporters were not allowed to interview, record or photograph in the auditorium where federal officials were accepting public comment about the Atlantic Coast Pipeline.  (Photo by Lisa Sorg)

Just 15 minutes after the doors opened last night, the auditorium at Forest Hills Middle School — a public school — in Wilson was beginning to fill with people.

But the “public” listening session about the Atlantic Coast Pipeline wasn’t really public. And only select people could listen.

Hosted by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the four-hour listening session was intended to take public comment on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement regarding the pipeline. But FERC officials prohibited the media (there were three  outlets — NCPW, Southeast Energy News and the Wilson Times) from interviewing citizens, recording comments or taking photographs inside the auditorium — even with permission from the citizens themselves. Reporters were allowed to do their jobs outside of the auditorium but could not be present for the listening sessions themselves.

The controversial 150-mile natural gas pipeline will run through eight counties in North Carolina, beginning in Northampton County and continuing to Robeson County. It is part of a larger 600-mile pipeline that begins in West Virginia.

Contacted this morning at the Washington, D.C., office, FERC spokeswoman Tamara Young-Allen said former Commission Chairman Norman Bay and Director of Energy Projects Ann Miles decided to change the way the meetings were conducted. The rationale, Young-Allen said, was that FERC had received complaints from citizens saying they hadn’t been able to comment during public scoping meetings. At those gatherings, citizens would publicly comment in front of fellow attendees and FERC staff.  Sometimes FERC would have booked the venue for three hours, but it took twice as long to get through the list of commenters.

Each speaker had a time limit, Young-Allen said, “but people ignored it or yielded their time. Some people would take more time to speak and not everyone had the opportunity.” Last night, 65 people attended the listening session in Wilson; 48 people commented. “It would have been half that in a town hall style meeting,” she said. The private listening sessions, she added, “have proven very successful,” and allow FERC “to have more control.”

That argument isn’t logical. Town councils, county commissioners, state and federal agencies conduct public comment and listening sessions — often on extremely contentious issues — every day. Speakers are given a time limit, usually two to three minutes, to ensure everyone who wants to comment, can. The meeting moderator — be it the mayor or a chairperson — is charged with keeping the speakers to their time. The meetings run as long as they need to, in order to honor the democratic process.

For example, several times a month, the NC Department of Environmental Quality holds public comment and listening sessions on air and water permits. The EPA often holds public meetings and listening sessions about Superfund and hazardous waste sites, most recently in Davidson, regarding an asbestos release. In 2007, the Department of Homeland Security hosted a packed meeting of 400 people in Granville County about the National Bio and Agro Defense Facility; public pressure helped thwart that project, which moved to Kansas. (It’s still not built.)

Young-Allen said that this time, the comments were supposed to specific to the Draft Environmental Impact statement. Previously, she said, comments were more general, such as “We don’t like it” or “I don’t want it in my backyard.”

Joe Poland, who lives in Nashville and opposes the pipeline, told NCPW he considered the listening session “illegal.”

Wilson resident Barbara Exum attended the meeting to oppose the pipeline. It will cross part of her family’s farm, which is nearly 100 years old. She told NCPW that when it was her turn to comment, she was led to a private room, where she sat down in front of a microphone, a FERC official and a court reporter. She said she was given three minutes to speak. With 30 seconds left, a FERC official raised a small red flag signaling that time was expiring.

Down the hall in the school cafeteria, Exum said she disliked the private meeting style: “This is a joke.”

4 Comments


  1. Tamara Young-Allen

    February 16, 2017 at 10:24 am

    There apparently is some confusion as to the purpose of these sessions. The purpose is to obtain public comments, for inclusion in the official public record, on the draft environmental impact statement for a project. These are not public hearings on the project. FERC staffers can answer questions that members of the public might have, but they do not engage in discussion of the merits of the project. A merits decision on a project is made by the five presidentially-appointed, Senate-confirmed members of the Commission. Their decision will be based on the public record developed, in part, at sessions such as these.

    Members of the public are gathered in a common area and then individually have the opportunity to go to a reserved area to give their comments to a stenographer and a FERC staffer. Those transcribed comments are posted in the Commission’s eLibrary and available for anyone to read. As such, they are public comments available to the press and anyone else.

    FERC’s eLibrary database may be found under the “Documents & Filings” tab at http://www.ferc.gov. When you click onto the “General Search” page, type the Atlantic Coast docket number this way to see what’s in the record so far –CP15-554. You may also eSubscribe for free by registering for this docket number. That way, you will receive email notices of activity in this docket.

    For reasons of security and decorum, the Commission does not permit demonstrations, interviews, recording, etc. in either the common area or the areas where individuals are giving their comments. The goal is to allow members of public to speak freely and give their comments without disruption. Again, this is a comment-gathering process that the Commission engages in to augment the development of the public record – written comments also can be filed with the Commission electronically or through US Mail.

    As I explained to you, Lisa, the Commission previously conducted town hall-style sessions to obtain comments. However, for various reasons – including the limited time available at the venues for these sessions, the fact that speakers did not always adhere to their allotted time, and disruptions by other audience members – the Commission adopted the new approach that permits more members of the public to provide their comments during the session. It has been very successful in achieving the goal of obtaining the greatest number of public comments possible.

    Reporters are always welcome to conduct interviews in public areas outside of the meeting space, and can ask questions of any member of the public willing to talk with them. Because these are comment sessions not public hearings, reporters are not in any way “excluded” from the business of the Commission. This is evidenced in your story’s final sentences where you quote Barbara Exum, a Wilson, NC resident. Tamara Young-Allen, FERC’s Division of Media Relations

  2. […] Card […]

  3. […] Read More […]

  4. […] room.  Media and documentary film-makers have been kept out of the forums, generating this NC Policy Watch article about the media shut out.  In one hearing, FERC contractors sought unsuccessfully to bar Sierra Club from handing out […]

Check Also

Despite the moratorium, Duke Energy moving ahead on wind energy plans

Although Sen. Harry Brown put an 18-month kibosh ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Senate favors form of merit selection for judges as alternative to House judicial redistricting bill [...]

North Carolinians hoping to find out who’s been funding Rep. Justin Burr’s crusade this legislative [...]

The SePro Corporation is receiving as much as $1.3 million in taxpayer money to chemically kill the [...]

Across the state, this year’s historically crowded municipal elections have drawn new types of candi [...]

Lawmakers to return to Raleigh yet again; agenda may include dangerous “de-reg” proposal The North C [...]

The three federal judges could have just come right out and said it: The Republicans who rule the N. [...]

3---number of states that adopted new state Earned Income Tax Credits in 2017---Montana, Hawaii, and [...]

The post Total Eclipse (of Democracy) appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more