Commentary, Trump Administration

Trump paid leave plan may not be much of one

During his address to Congress Tuesday night, President Trump again raised the dual issues of paid leave and child care, expressing a desire to work across the aisle on both policies. The move was intended to appeal to women lawmakers, many of whom wore white to the address in protest of his negative personal and professional track record on women’s issues.

In previous statements, Trump outlined a proposal that would stop short of actual paid family leave to cover parental leave only. Further concerning advocates was the apparent intention to cover only new biological mothers, excluding fathers, adoptive parents and others from accessing the leave.

While Trump’s language during Tuesday’s address was slightly more vague about who would be eligible under his paid parental leave plan, it’s clear that family leave — which would allow working people to take paid leave to care for other family members, or recover from serious illness — still isn’t on the table. Then there’s the issue of how we’ll pay for it; in previous versions of the proposal, Trump outlined his intent to pay for the program using already inadequate unemployment insurance funds.

The effect of excluding fathers is exceedingly problematic from a workplace equity perspective. Establishing a parental leave program that only women can access will almost certainly have negative consequences for women workers, making it less likely for women of childbearing age to rise to the top of the candidate pool, receive promotions and generally thrive in the workplace.

If President Trump really wants to improve the lot of working families via a paid leave policy, there’s already a bill in Congress that would do that. It’s called the Family & Medical Leave Act, and it’s broadly supported by most of the women lawmakers he’s so eager to work with. Perhaps he should start there.

Check Also

As #WageWeek winds down, local efforts stand out

This piece was written by Workers’ Rights Project ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

A court really shouldn’t shirk away from making a finding about a constitutional violation just beca [...]

Jim Womack has a reputation in North Carolina for being many things, but a conservationist isn’t one [...]

Just days after a North Carolina official tapped a Robeson County elementary for a controversial cha [...]

Two groups seeking state contracts to run struggling North Carolina schools have professional ties t [...]

20---amount in dollars of the average federal tax cuts in 2027 for households with children earning [...]

The folks running the General Assembly reached a new low this week in their efforts to dismantle our [...]

National civil rights leaders call for the rejection of North Carolina’s Thomas Farr [Editor’s note: [...]

Budgets matter, both within government and inside each household across America, because they demons [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more