HB2, News

Federal appeals court schedules arguments in HB2 challenge

The U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals has scheduled oral arguments in the lawsuit challenging House Bill 2, North Carolina’s sweeping anti-LGBTQ legislation. The hearing is May 10 in Richmond, Virginia.

The ACLU of North Carolina announced Monday that a three-judge panel with the federal appeals court will consider a request to block the anti-transgender provisions of HB2 that ban individuals from using restrooms and locker rooms that match their gender.

In August 2016, a lower court blocked the University of North Carolina from enforcing those provisions against three transgender plaintiffs in the case, Carcaño v. McCrory.

In addition to the transgender public facilities provisions, HB2 also prohibits local municipalities from extending nondiscrimination protections to  lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people. There has been an ongoing tussle between Republicans and Democrats to repeal the bill.

The ACLU and Lambda Legal, which represent four LGBT North Carolinians and members of the ACLU of North Carolina in the legal challenge, released the following joint statement:

“We look forward to being back in court to fight to ensure that all transgender people in North Carolina are treated with the dignity and respect that they deserve and that is required by law. House Bill 2 represents an egregious attack on transgender people and their ability to participate in public life. While we continue to urge North Carolina legislators to repeal the law entirely, without still sanctioning discrimination, particularly against transgender people, we cannot wait for lawmakers to do the right thing. We will continue to fight for the rights of LGBT North Carolinians in court and beyond.”

The statement also included information about the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to send its landmark transgender rights case back to the same appeals court to be reconsidered in light of President Donald Trump’s rollback on protections for transgender students.

While the May 10 hearing at the Fourth Circuit will not focus on Title IX but rather constitutional grounds under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the full lawsuit challenging H.B. 2 raises Title VII, Title IX and constitutional claims.

One Comment


  1. […] There are at least five other federal district courts that have ruled in favor of transgender student rights, explained Grimm’s attorney, the American Civil Liberties Union’s Joshua Block, in a call with reporters Monday. All of those decisions still stand. Meanwhile, there are at least three cases pending in federal courts of appeals that have also ruled Title IX protects students like Grimm from being discriminated against because of their gender identity. Two of those cases, one from the Sixth Circuit and another from the Seventh Circuit, had been put on hold pending resolution of Grimm’s case. Another, a challenge to North Carolina’s discriminatory “bathroom bill” HB 2, is scheduled to be heard by the Fourth Circuit Court in May. […]

Check Also

Brennan Center remembers Citizens United 10 years later; urges reform

Ten years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court opened ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

More than two decades after a landmark state Supreme Court ruling, NC moves a step closer to assurin [...]

Last summer, Chemours sent contractors to the Cumberland County home of Katrina Rubiera and tested h [...]

Today is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, a national holiday to honor and celebrate the life of the civil [...]

WASHINGTON — The U.S. House passed a resolution Thursday that would overturn a Trump administration [...]

If North Carolina Republicans are confounded by the notion that every last one of them disdains publ [...]

As we commemorated the 46th anniversary of the historic Supreme Court decision Roe v Wade last year, [...]

And just like that, another critical election year is upon us – maybe the most important election ye [...]

The post An apple for teacher. appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]