Commentary

Editorial: Time to lay bare the truth of GOP bullying

The Charlotte Observer has taken the unusual step of publishing a dissenting editorial from one of its editorial board members and it is a good one.

In it, Interim Associate Editor Isaac Bailey does a fine job of explaining why Democrats should filibuster Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch:

“I get why others, such as my colleagues on the Observer’s Editorial Board, see things differently and believe Democrats should not filibuster Gorsuch. The instinct is a sound one, akin to the mother telling her son that violence is never the answer.

But the messy truth is that sometimes the bully won’t get the message until he’s been punched in the nose.

We’ve come to this moment because of the words and deeds of high-profile Republicans from the Carolinas. South Carolina’s senior senator, Lindsey Graham, led the charge in denying Merrick Garland a hearing after then-President Obama nominated Garland for the Supreme Court seat that needed to be filled in the wake of Justice Antonin Scalia’s death. North Carolina Sen. Richard Burr underscored just how extreme the GOP has become when he declared that even if Hillary Clinton won the presidency, he would ‘do everything I can do to make sure four years from now, we still got an opening on the Supreme Court.’

He also bragged that he was already responsible for the longest judicial vacancy ever by denying the confirmation of an Obama nominee in the eastern district of North Carolina, illustrating just why Democrats felt the need to use the nuclear option for lower court appointments when they were in control. They did so in response to a Republican Party that routinely filibustered Obama nominees. While they haven’t gotten as much attention, that tactic left dozens of empty judicial seats throughout the country that can now be filled by President Donald Trump.

Democrats are far from perfect, but the party never left the nation’s top court short-handed for more than a year for nakedly political purposes. The Democratic filibuster won’t prevent Gorsuch from making the Supreme Court whole. It will just lay bare the truth that the GOP is willing to do whatever possible to get its way. Democrats going along with the Gorsuch nomination would only make it harder for the public to notice that stark reality.”

After further documenting and skewering Lindsay Graham’s absurd hypocrisy, Bailey closes like this:

“Graham doesn’t hate that a Senate tradition is about to be destroyed – because he was responsible for much of its destruction.

If Democrats simply went along and acted as though the GOP’s purposeful decision to leave the Supreme Court short-handed for a year was a legitimate exercise of political power, they would unwittingly be codifying that extremism.

And that would not be good for either party – or the country.”

Check Also

Another scathing editorial blasts UNC system’s leadership

The leaders of the UNC system got a ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Last summer, Chemours sent contractors to the Cumberland County home of Katrina Rubiera and tested h [...]

Today is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, a national holiday to honor and celebrate the life of the civil [...]

WASHINGTON — The U.S. House passed a resolution Thursday that would overturn a Trump administration [...]

North Carolina is projected to gain a U.S. House seat in the coming years, recent data show — a chan [...]

As we commemorated the 46th anniversary of the historic Supreme Court decision Roe v Wade last year, [...]

And just like that, another critical election year is upon us – maybe the most important election ye [...]

The post An apple for teacher. appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

There is a temptation—and believe me, I understand it—to celebrate the fleeting nature of this week’ [...]