News

Constitutional Convention resolution, wave of election bills passes late night Senate committee

The Senate Select Committee on Elections passed a wave of bills Tuesday night that would change numerous election processes in the state. They also passed a resolution calling for a Constitutional Convention to make changes to the U.S. Constitution.

Sen. Terry Van Duyn

Republicans outnumbered Democrats 6 to 2 at the meeting, and there was little input from the public on the six bills that were passed. Sen. Democratic Leader Dan Blue and Sen. Terry Van Duyn (D-Buncombe) voted against the measures and spoke against a few of them.

The Constitutional Convention resolution was not introduced until minutes before the meeting, but a Senator was able to give two residents a heads up, and they spoke in favor of the measure at the meeting. North Carolinians who may have been against the resolution were not given the same courtesy.

The other bills that were passed included a moratorium on extending voting hours at one precinct during an election, unless all precinct voting hours are extended; making Carteret County Board of Education elections partisan; and changing the primary elections dates in the state.

Sen. Chuck Edwards

The bill that was discussed the longest was Senate Bill 285, which subdivides Asheville into six districts for city council elections. The bill, introduced by Sen. Chuck Edwards (R-Buncombe, Henderson, Transylvania), would require that city council members be elected in the districts and the mayor be elected citywide.

Asheville would be required to draw its own maps by November, and if they failed to do so, the General Assembly would do it for them.

Edwards told the committee that he didn’t want to broach creating districts in Asheville, but that some citizens had approached him and said they felt disenfranchised.

Van Duyn, who represents 85 percent of Asheville residents, said she had never once been approached by anyone asking her to split the city into districts, and that she has received requests not to do so.

She said the city was planning a referendum in November and asked legislators as a professional courtesy to give Asheville residents a chance first to weigh in on the issue before passing such a bill.

“I understand I’m in the minority, but this is my city,” Van Duyn said.

A contract lobbyist for the city also spoke to the legislators and said there would indeed be a referendum in November. He asked that if legislators were going to pass the bill, if they could at least not make it effective until after November.

Edwards said the city has already been given too long to sort out issues it has and create districts, and that the bill would just push them into action. He said it was time for “government to govern.”

In the end, Republicans voted to give the bill a favorable report.

One Comment


  1. Patti Ulirsch

    April 26, 2017 at 10:13 pm

    Republicans behaving badly, very badly.

Check Also

The Hill: National GOP mapmaker dies in Raleigh after battle with cancer

The father of unconstitutionally gerrymandered maps in North ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Public school demographics in the United States are shifting, but, based on emerging national data, [...]

Ninety-nine years ago today, a stalemate between two states nearly derailed the women's suffrag [...]

The emails began going out at the University of North Carolina earlier this summer. Warnings that fe [...]

Litigation over the November election ballot is not likely to end anytime soon, but absentee by-mail [...]

When Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy announced his retirement from the highest court in the la [...]

The post The Power Grab appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

North Carolina made history again Monday, the not-so-bad kind. If you were in earshot of Raleigh Mon [...]

A summer of hectic twists and turns has made it increasingly clear: The North Carolina General Assem [...]