agriculture, Environment

Rep. Jimmy Dixon, recipient of free federal money, accuses clean energy of taking corporate welfare

Rep. Jimmy Dixon: Opposes corporate welfare unless it applies to farmers (Photo: NCGA)

This post has been updated with comments from Rep. Dixon.

Rep. Jimmy Dixon, the mastermind behind at least 10 anti-environmental bills this session, has targeted renewable energy as his ennemi du jour. He’s particularly incensed by tax credits and other subsidies for wind and solar.

This is from his Facebook page:

It is an insult to our agriculture and farming heritage to continue to call wind and solar facilities “farms.” It is also a fraud on the hard working rate payers who are required to purchase the higher cost energy these facilities produce. Without corporate welfare in the form of tax credits and property tax abatements they would not be viable. 

But Dixon isn’t mentioning that he has received thousands of dollars in corporate welfare from the federal government — the same federal government he has repeatedly accused of overreach.

From 1995 to 2014, Dixon, a Duplin County farmer, received $21,353 in subsidies from the US Department of Agriculture. These payments are logged with the USDA; the Environmental Working Group compiled the giveaways in its national Farm Subsidy Database. According to Duplin County property records, Dixon owns about 66 acres in Warsaw.

Of that amount, roughly half — $10,146 — was paid to Dixon in commodity subsidies for livestock, corn, wheat, soybeans and cotton. The other half — $11,207 — was for disaster payments. Dixon did not respond to an email seeking comment.

Dixon told NCPW via email that the tax credits and property tax abatements are “much different” than the farm subsidies for indemnity — when more livestock die than usual, generally because of adverse weather — or disaster relief. “I do not consider the payments I received as welfare, and certainly not corporate welfare, since I did not apply as a corporation.”

Until 2014, the USDA directly paid farmers subsidies in order to offset market fluctuations in crops and livestock, including chickens. (The 2014 Farm Bill changed the commodities law to help wean farmers off the federal teat, although now they can receive more subsidies in the form of crop insurance.)

Natural disasters, such as hurricanes and floods, can decimate farms. So in addition to subsidizing crop insurance, Congress appropriates money to compensate farmers who have lost crops or livestock as a result of these occurrences. Hurricanes Fran (1996) and Floyd, Dennis and Irene (1999) would have likely qualified Dixon for disaster subsidies in those years.

Dixon is low on the food chain, though, in terms of federal money received. According to the EWG, the top five farms in North Carolina each received from $5.5 million to nearly $8 million from 1995-2014.

Check Also

Durham officials tighten loopholes on illegal dumping near Falls Lake, but enforcement remains lax

Years of illegal dumping near Falls Lake finally ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Students, faculty and legal experts are all questioning last week’s legal settlement in which the UN [...]

In addition to historic cemeteries and archaeological resources, state is concerned about asbestos, [...]

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon is failing to ensure that all military families have access to safe, quali [...]

North Carolina Republicans officially ran out the clock – at least legally – when they enacted a new [...]

Despite having voted to expand the economics and personal finance curriculum in the state’s high sch [...]

It may be difficult to say how you are feeling this morning, two mornings after a Superior Court pan [...]

Well, that appears to be a wrap. The 2019 legislative session that commenced way back in January and [...]

The post Sons of Confederate Veterans give thanks to UNC appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]