Courts & the Law, News

National courts expert: North Carolina legislature leading national trend targeting state courts

Alicia Bannon, senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice

North Carolina’s is not the only legislature targeting the court system for political gain, but it is an outlier, and folks across the nation are following closely what happens, according to Alicia Bannon with the Brennan Center for Justice.

A new report that Bannon co-authored found that at least 41 bills in 15 states have targeted state courts, including efforts to control the ways by which judges reach the bench, to unseat judges currently on courts and generally to restrict courts’ jurisdiction and power.

She spoke briefly WFAE in Charlotte earlier this week about how North Carolina is leading the national trend.

“In part because of the sheer number of bills that have been considered in the legislature this session and including the number that have actually passed, North Carolina has really been an outlier in the extent to which the legislature has been targeting the courts in a number of different dimensions,” she said in the interview. “I also think the political context in North Carolina is really notable.”

She said it wasn’t until the November election, when Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper was elected and state Supreme Court Justice Mike Morgan’s election turned the high court back to Democratic control, that the legislature started making a partisan push for control of the courts.

Bannon also spoke about House Bill 100, which made Superior and District Court judicial elections partisan again. On one hand, she said, the “R” or “D” on the ballot could give voters more information, but on the other, there’s a real concern about judges being too closely linked to political parties.

She added that the measure also happened in an environment where the move was plainly motivated by partisan interest.

“What I think is so concerning is that it’s very important that judges have this space to hear cases and decide those cases based on their understanding of the law, and that the public should be confident that that’s what they’re doing,” Bannon said.

When asked whether the state was being used as a test for other areas to try similar measures, she said she thinks there are a lot of people watching North Carolina very closely.

“I do think that North Carolina is very much now a state where there’s a lot that’s being tried out, there are a lot of boundaries that are being tested, and I think how the state responds to that is going to be a very telling lesson for people that may be looking to do similar things in other states as well,” she said.

One Comment


  1. NC Citizen

    May 14, 2017 at 1:15 am

    Berger wants the Courts to be his rubber-stamp of approval.

Check Also

Lawmakers will hear public comment on Congressional maps tomorrow

Congressional redistricting at the North Carolina legislature appears ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

North Carolinians were presented with more than a dozen congressional maps by Tuesday night and had [...]

After a weeks-long storm of investigations, leaks and accusations of unethical behavior on North Car [...]

When it began in 1919, it was “Armistice Day” — a celebration of the end of World War I. It became a [...]

Peter Romary worked for UNC board member Tom Fetzer, but claimed connections to Senate leader Phil B [...]

“The hymn in church yesterday,” Dan Gerlach, the embattled former ECU interim chancellor, tweeted Su [...]

Back in the early 1990’s, the late and sorely missed Bob Hensley – a talented, feisty and frequently [...]

The post Berger on shaky ground appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Today marks 100 days since I filed an official request with the Department of Public Instruction to [...]