Environment

Under proposed billboard legislation, outdoor advertising companies have more property rights than people living near hog farms

(Photo from www.bitemefirearms.net)

O n the way to the beach along US 70, the billboards, like the landscape, change in tone: Further inland, billboards bearing “Bite Me Firearms” dominate the highway, while closer to the coast, ads featuring women touting the benefits of breast augmentation become common.

More billboards could cover the roadsides after the House Finance Committee today bundled portions of four measures into one mega-legislation, giving more power to outdoor advertising companies. The changes were part of a proposed committee substitute to House Bill 581. Rep. David Lewis, a Republican from Harnett County, is the sponsor.

If HB 581 becomes law, billboard companies would have even greater latitude in where they can place their signs (including the retina-burning digital versions), the amount taxpayers would pony up if a sign must be removed, and the number of trees that can be felled to make the ads visible.

This legislation also overrides parts of local billboard ordinances. Durham, for example, prohibits digital billboards inside the city limits. Under HB 581, companies can switch out their static billboards for flashing ones, regardless of local regulations.

Outdoor advertising companies could also relocate billboards to places they are currently prohibited, as long as they are in the same jurisdiction. For example, there is a two-mile section of the Durham Freeway, from about Exit 11 (Alston Avenue) to Exit 13 (Chapel Hill Street) — the “gateway” to the city, where billboards are not allowed. Under this language, a billboard could be moved from outside that zone and into it, as long as the sign originated in Durham.

Of concern to environmental advocates is the potential loss of trees as a result of the measure. If a company decides trees are obscuring the view of the ad — which, according to the legislation, has a “right to be visibly seen” — that greenery can be clear cut, even in medians and at exit ramps. According to the North Carolina chapter of the Sierra Club, dogwoods and redbuds would lose their current protected status.

HB 581: a major giveaway of taxpayer revenues, trees & local government control Click To Tweet

“The bill is a major giveaway of public money and assets — including taxpayer revenues, the public’s trees and local government control,” said Molly Diggins, Sierra Club state director, in a statement, “to shore up and increase the profitability of an industry that is increasingly becoming obsolete.”

In referring to taxpayer revenues, Diggins is referring to a portion of the bill that forces state or local governments that require the removal of a sign — to build a bridge, for example — to pay for lost advertising revenue, as opposed to covering only the replacement cost of the sign.

As a philosophical exercise, contrast this billboard provision with the hog nuisance lawsuit legislation — now law.

Under the nuisance bill, citizens who sue a hog farm over quality of life issues (and win) can receive compensation only for the fair value of their property, not the loss of their health or enjoyment of their home.

The billboard measure, though, flips that scenario. A company is not limited to only the fair value of the sign; the company can be compensated for “loss.”

How advertising revenue would be calculated is also unclear. Sometimes billboard companies heavily discount outdoor ads to nonprofits or government agencies. (This is not for purely altruistic reasons. These near-freebies help fill the excess inventory; empty billboards are not a good look for outdoor advertising companies.) So would the government agency be charged the full advertising rate? Or just the amount the advertiser was paying at the time?

Either way, the advertising company that erects a billboard objectifying women has more property rights than people living near industrialized hog farms.

2 Comments


  1. Tom

    May 24, 2017 at 11:32 am

    “retina burning”, “billboards objectifying women”. I guess we know where YOU stand on the subject of billboards!
    You compare a sign business’ compensation with NEIGHBORS of a hog confinement but not the hog confinement itself? That isn’t even apples to oranges.
    Tell me, if you owned a business and the government widened the road and took your property, would you be happy with the value of your building and land, and not your business value? No, I’m sure you would not. So why should a billboard company be happy with that? Where I come from, sign companies are compensated for the average revenue the sign generates. But go ahead and try to skew opinion with your comment about the ads that are free. Doesn’t matter if it is true, or objective journalism, as long as it fits how you want it to read.
    Your article should be more balanced. THAT would be good journalism.

  2. Douglas

    May 28, 2017 at 11:51 am

    So is there a chance that HB 581could become a law?
    I wasn’t aware of this.
    Also thanks for sharing this.

Check Also

In the House, a major amendment to controversial Duke Energy rate-making bill hands the hot potato back to the Senate

A key provision in Senate Bill 559 was upended in ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Ag Commissioner Troxler opts in; 770 workers under Treasurer Folwell, Labor Commissioner Berry will [...]

Before the State Board of Education approved its new five-year strategic plan, SBE member James E. F [...]

Last week Robin Jordan shared her experience at a field hearing on Medicaid expansion organized by N [...]

Every year, North Carolina removes registered voters from its voter rolls as part of a maintenance r [...]

The post Cooper to Trump: “Not so fast” appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

If there is a single brightest and most hopeful bit of news on the North Carolina public policy hori [...]

Thirty-two seconds. That’s how long it took for the madman responsible for the carnage in Dayton, Oh [...]

It can’t have escaped many folks’ notice – even those, bless their hearts, for whom the really big n [...]