News

The state of the concealed gun debate

House Bill 746, which would do away with the need for a concealed carry permit for handguns in most cases, passed the House this week and is headed for the Senate.

But it didn’t pass the House with enough GOP support to sustain a veto, should Gov. Roy Cooper reject the bill when it hits his desk. That leaves some options as it heads to the Senate:

  1. Lawmakers could kill the bill in the Senate to save GOP colleagues the agony of letting Cooper’s veto stand (and handing him a political victory on an issue most people actually understand rather than something complex and technical).
  2. They can try to twist some arms should that veto come and pray there are some Republicans willing to vote for a bill they’ve twice voted against and in some cases made strong arguments against in order to spite Cooper.
  3. They can try to fix the bill, making it more palatable to a larger number of GOP lawmakers (Demcorats stood united against it in the House). But how to do that without adding in mandatory firearms training (which would require some sort of permitting system in the first place) isn’t yet clear. Raising the age at which people could carry concealed without a permit from 18 to 21 might move the needle a bit, but conservative sheriffs, police chiefs and law enforcement groups all say they want to see actual training.

Meanwhile, the state of the debate — and the seriousness with which some are taking it — can be gauged by this stick figure cartoon, which was making its way around the House floor this week and was shared – among others – by  Rep. John Blust (R-Guilford) online as well.

A closer look:

Folks who don’t find it that simple include Guilford County Sheriff BJ Barnes, Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page, Wake County Sheriff Donnie Harrison, all conservative Republicans. Add to that list the North Carolina Association of Chiefs of Police, the Fraternal Order of Police and Blust’s fellow Guilford County Republican, Rep. John Faircloth (himself a former High Point Chief of Police). They’ve all taken issue with parts of the bill, chiefly the age and training requirements.

There’s also the majority of North Carolina voters, as demonstrated by two polls on the issue.

One Comment


  1. Keith W. Bowles

    June 10, 2017 at 9:23 pm

    NC HB 746 is a good idea that needs adult solutions: TRAINING is the answer….NOT magically turninrg 18!! And who in their right REALLY expects a citizen who simply WANTS to carry a gun to commit to automatic response ALL the legal requirements described in this HB? Our current certification requires a measly 70 % on a Legal Test to become certifed to carry concealed. Now we want to launch a program for 18 year olds (or older) which enables them to carry a gun and potentially use deadly force without reading one word regarding deadly force?

    We need to keep what we have (CERTIFICATION of TRAINING), and THEN figure out where Constitutional Carry can fit in.

Check Also

UNC grad student on the misuse of Classics in support of Silent Sam

When UNC History student Maya Little was arrested ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

North Carolina election employees could soon be facing stricter scrutiny. House members rolled out a [...]

In one of the largest campaign donation forfeitures in state history, 48 improper donations from the [...]

Friends, neighbors, colleagues of commission chairman Jim Womack submit nearly identical letters cla [...]

When N.C. House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger addressed reporters last [...]

In the aftermath of the recent successful push to ward off huge cuts to food assistance programs in [...]

There are a lot of important statistics that confirm just how out of whack the U.S. economy has grow [...]

The post Bite the Apple & NC’s HB2 Legacy appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When I headed off to college, I could not have predicted that many of the funding streams, positions [...]

Now hiring

NC Policy Watch is now hiring a Managing Editor – click here for more info.