Courts & the Law, News

State Supreme Court Chief Justice makes call for judicial merit selection instead of elections

State Supreme Court Chief Justice Mark Martin called on the General Assembly today to introduce a constitutional amendment to change judicial elections to a judicial merit selection process.

He made remarks today at the North Carolina Bar Association’s annual meeting in Asheville.

“Now I know that there’s never a good time to talk about merit selection of judges,” he said. “Critics will say that you’re trying to help one political party or the other. But I’ve been working on this issue for a long time. It’s a good government issue, not a political one.”

The recommendation was one made by the North Carolina Commission on the Administrative of Law and Justice, an interdisciplinary group that evaluated the framework of the state’s judicial branch.

“In order to enhance and preserve the highest degree of judicial integrity, fairness, and impartiality, the General Assembly should develop a selection process that ensures the highest caliber of judges and justices and minimizes the potential impact of campaigning and fundraising on judicial independence and public accountability,” the final report states.

Martin said at the meeting Saturday that he believes the judiciary should be as independent as possible.

“It should be free from the political considerations that are a normal and healthy part of the Executive and Legislative Branches,” he said.

He proposed the following basic components to ensure judges are independent and well qualified:

• First, a panel should evaluate judicial candidates in an objective and non- ideological way, and rate them as Well Qualified, Qualified, or Not Qualified. Both the Governor and the General Assembly should be able to appoint members of this panel;

• Second, an appropriate governmental authority with accountability to the people of North Carolina should appoint our State’s judges;

• And third, retention elections should be held at periodic intervals to ensure that the people of North Carolina continue to have a role in the process.

The General Assembly recently voted to make all judicial elections partisan again, joining the ranks of only seven other states, because they said they wanted voters to be equipped with more information when voting for judges.

Lawmakers have introduced and passed a number of bills this session changing the composition of the courts — bills that have been described by advocates and experts as blatant partisan power plays to politicize the judiciary.

With the exception of raising the juvenile age of prosecution, Martin has remained silent on all of those changes, despite recommendations from his commission that go against what lawmakers have been doing.

When asked in an email about a week ago about plans Martin had to announce a constitutional amendment request, Administrative Office of the Courts spokeswoman Sharon Gladwell said she hadn’t heard anything about it. The announcement was made via press release.

One Comment


  1. John Christian

    June 26, 2017 at 3:29 pm

    The concept as presented is flawed. The idea that the General Assembly could develop a judicial “selection process that preserves judicial integrity, fairness, and impartiality” is ridiculous. The Republicans in the General Assembly would view the entire process as an opportunity for a judicial power grab, a key step for obtaining and maintaining ultimate power. If Mark Martin truly wanted a fair and impartial judiciary, he would promote a process that would minimize partisan manipulation.

Check Also

Superior Court judges hire lobbyists; merit selection plan could be unveiled by end of October

The North Carolina Conference of Superior Court Judges ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The 12 minutes spent on the phone with Duke Energy customer service shed no light on how — or if — c [...]

Crumbling ceilings. Failing air conditioning and heating systems. Broken down school buses. Mold inf [...]

This story has been updated with comments from Jim Womack, who did not respond earlier to questions. [...]

For the 18 months, Gary Brown has been traveling through northeastern North Carolina like an itinera [...]

Last week, the General Assembly announced which legislators will serve on the Joint Legislative Task [...]

The latest effort in Washington to repeal and not actually replace the Affordable Care Act has a dif [...]

Conservative group “reviewing” bigoted attacks; funding from major NC corporations implicated Nearly [...]

5---number of days since Senators Bill Cassidy and Lindsey Graham unveiled a new proposal to repeal [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more