Courts & the Law, News

State Supreme Court Chief Justice makes call for judicial merit selection instead of elections

State Supreme Court Chief Justice Mark Martin called on the General Assembly today to introduce a constitutional amendment to change judicial elections to a judicial merit selection process.

He made remarks today at the North Carolina Bar Association’s annual meeting in Asheville.

“Now I know that there’s never a good time to talk about merit selection of judges,” he said. “Critics will say that you’re trying to help one political party or the other. But I’ve been working on this issue for a long time. It’s a good government issue, not a political one.”

The recommendation was one made by the North Carolina Commission on the Administrative of Law and Justice, an interdisciplinary group that evaluated the framework of the state’s judicial branch.

“In order to enhance and preserve the highest degree of judicial integrity, fairness, and impartiality, the General Assembly should develop a selection process that ensures the highest caliber of judges and justices and minimizes the potential impact of campaigning and fundraising on judicial independence and public accountability,” the final report states.

Martin said at the meeting Saturday that he believes the judiciary should be as independent as possible.

“It should be free from the political considerations that are a normal and healthy part of the Executive and Legislative Branches,” he said.

He proposed the following basic components to ensure judges are independent and well qualified:

• First, a panel should evaluate judicial candidates in an objective and non- ideological way, and rate them as Well Qualified, Qualified, or Not Qualified. Both the Governor and the General Assembly should be able to appoint members of this panel;

• Second, an appropriate governmental authority with accountability to the people of North Carolina should appoint our State’s judges;

• And third, retention elections should be held at periodic intervals to ensure that the people of North Carolina continue to have a role in the process.

The General Assembly recently voted to make all judicial elections partisan again, joining the ranks of only seven other states, because they said they wanted voters to be equipped with more information when voting for judges.

Lawmakers have introduced and passed a number of bills this session changing the composition of the courts — bills that have been described by advocates and experts as blatant partisan power plays to politicize the judiciary.

With the exception of raising the juvenile age of prosecution, Martin has remained silent on all of those changes, despite recommendations from his commission that go against what lawmakers have been doing.

When asked in an email about a week ago about plans Martin had to announce a constitutional amendment request, Administrative Office of the Courts spokeswoman Sharon Gladwell said she hadn’t heard anything about it. The announcement was made via press release.

One Comment


  1. John Christian

    June 26, 2017 at 3:29 pm

    The concept as presented is flawed. The idea that the General Assembly could develop a judicial “selection process that preserves judicial integrity, fairness, and impartiality” is ridiculous. The Republicans in the General Assembly would view the entire process as an opportunity for a judicial power grab, a key step for obtaining and maintaining ultimate power. If Mark Martin truly wanted a fair and impartial judiciary, he would promote a process that would minimize partisan manipulation.

Check Also

Supreme Court blocks lower court’s order for NC to redraw partisan congressional maps

The U.S. Supreme Court has granted state lawmakers’ ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

On a cozy autumn evening at the luxurious Umstead Hotel in Cary, a medley of corporate luminaries, s [...]

A fix for North Carolina’s class size crisis in March? A GOP senator from Wake County tells his cons [...]

Back in September, the N.C. Historical Commission put off a decision on removing three Confederate m [...]

449,235 - Total undergrad enrollment in North Carolina 19,767 - Total for-profit undergrad enrollmen [...]

Mounting student debt is a nagging problem for most families these days. As the cost of higher educa [...]

Latest racist attacks on immigrants could be an important tipping point As bleak as our national pol [...]

Grand constitutional questions in this country aren’t settled until the Supreme Court has its say, e [...]

The post Gerrymander struck down appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more