Courts & the Law, News

Federal court dismisses lawsuit over religious magistrates allowed to refuse performing same-sex marriages

The 4th Circuit Court of Appeals on Wednesday upheld the GOP’s Senate Bill 2, a law that allows North Carolina magistrates to refuse to perform same-sex marriages based on their religious beliefs.

A three-judge panel from the Richmond-based court dismissed Ansley v. Warren because the couples who brought the suit did not have standing as North Carolina taxpayers.

“The outcome here is in no way a comment on same-sex marriage as a matter of social policy,” the 18-page opinion states. “The case before us is far more technical — whether plaintiffs, simply by virtue of their status as state taxpayers, have alleged a personal, particularized injury for the purposes of Article III standing. Based on a century of Supreme Court precedent, we conclude that they have not.”

The Campaign for Southern Equality responded to the ruling and said the plaintiffs are considering further legal options, either appealing to the entire federal Appeals Court or to the U.S. Supreme Court.

“SB2 is unjust and distorts the true meaning of religious freedom,” said the Rev. Jasmine Beach-Ferrara, executive director of the Campaign for Southern Equality. “From day one, it’s been clear that SB2 is about one thing – finding a new way to discriminate against same-sex couples and privileging one set of religious beliefs over others. We will keep standing up to discrimination until LGBTQ North Carolinians are equal in every sphere of life.”

The ruling was a win for Republican leaders. Senate President Pro-Tem Phil Berger, who sponsored SB2, praised the court’s decision.

“Once again, a federal court has rejected the idea that exercising one’s First Amendment religious freedoms somehow infringes on others’ rights – which was made clear when the plaintiffs couldn’t find even one North Carolinian who was unable to get married under this law,” he said in a statement.

Lawmakers passed SB2 over former Republican Gov. Pat McCrory’s veto.

The three-judge panel’s decision was unanimous, written by James Harvie Wilkinson III who was joined by Judges Barbara Milano Keenan and Stephanie Dawn Thacker.

Check Also

Federal court adopts special master’s legislative districts for 2018 elections

The North Carolina redistricting news just keeps on ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Nothing is off the table when it comes to Republican judicial reform, and a former Wake County judge [...]

On a cozy autumn evening at the luxurious Umstead Hotel in Cary, a medley of corporate luminaries, s [...]

A fix for North Carolina’s class size crisis in March? A GOP senator from Wake County tells his cons [...]

Back in September, the N.C. Historical Commission put off a decision on removing three Confederate m [...]

It was a snowy and shortened work week for a lot of people in North Carolina, but unfortunately, tha [...]

Mounting student debt is a nagging problem for most families these days. As the cost of higher educa [...]

Latest racist attacks on immigrants could be an important tipping point As bleak as our national pol [...]

Grand constitutional questions in this country aren’t settled until the Supreme Court has its say, e [...]

Upcoming Events

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more