Courts & the Law, News

Today: Judges will hear arguments in NC Board of Education v. NC, DPI Superintendent

Were North Carolina lawmakers acting constitutionally when they transferred power from the State Board of Education to newly elected Superintendent of Public Instruction Mark Johnson?

A three judge panel will hear arguments on both sides starting at 10 a.m. today in the courtroom of the state Court of Appeals on Morgan Street.

The State Board of Education sued North Carolina just before the New Year over legislators’ action transferring power from the Board to Johnson, a recently elected Republican. House Bill 17 was passed during a special session in December. It later added Johnson to the suit.

In its lawsuit, the Board points to Article IX, Section 5 of the North Carolina Constitution, which expressly confers certain “powers and duties” on the Board.

Those constitutional powers and duties include supervising the free public school system; administering the free public school system; supervising the educational funds provided for the free public school system’s support; and administering the educational funds provided for the free public school system’s support.

When lawmakers passed HB17, it was the first time in the Board’s 148-year history legislators attempted to transfer those powers and duties to a single individual.

North Carolina asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit because it has sovereign immunity, or is exempt from legal action. You can read the state’s full response to the lawsuit here.

Johnson also asked the court to dismiss the case, claiming in his response that he is a constitutional officer and that the Board failed to meet the burden of proving the challenged provisions of HB17 unconstitutional. You can read his full response here.

You can see all the documents filed in NC State Board of Education v. The State of North Carolina and Mark Johnson here.

State Supreme Court Chief Justice Mark Martin appointed the following judges to preside over the case: Judge Forrest Donald Bridges, who is registered to vote as a Democrat and presides in Cleveland and Lincoln counties; Judge James F. Ammons Jr., a former Democrat now registered as unaffiliated who presides in Cumberland County; and Judge Martin B. McGee, a Republican who presides in Cabarrus County.

Because of HB17’s conflict with the Constitution, experts have said that the State Board of Education’s argument is strong and they expect the Board to prevail.

Check Also

Berger’s chief of staff: Senate committee appointments coming to discuss best way to pick judges

The Senate President Pro Tem‘s chief of staff ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Jim Womack has a reputation in North Carolina for being many things, but a conservationist isn’t one [...]

Just days after a North Carolina official tapped a Robeson County elementary for a controversial cha [...]

Two groups seeking state contracts to run struggling North Carolina schools have professional ties t [...]

North Carolinians will lose their “precious right to vote,” as U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader [...]

The folks running the General Assembly reached a new low this week in their efforts to dismantle our [...]

National civil rights leaders call for the rejection of North Carolina’s Thomas Farr [Editor’s note: [...]

Budgets matter, both within government and inside each household across America, because they demons [...]

Why the legislature now operates this way and why it’s a big problem The North Carolina General Asse [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more