Commentary

BCRAP: Latest acronym for Senate health care bill says it all

A statement issued yesterday afternoon by the good people at the North Carolina Justice Health Advocacy Project put things plainly and bluntly in describing the latest dreadful U.S. Senate healthcare proposal:

Statement: New Better Care Reconciliation Act Proposal Is the Same Old BCRAP
Bill Still Guts Health Care for Low-Income Kids & Older Adults, While New Provisions Nix Critical Protections for Pre-Existing Conditions

RALEIGH (July 13, 2017)— Today, U.S. Senate Republican leadership unveiled a revised version of the Better Care Reconciliation Act (BCRA). Unfortunately, the latest version is only cosmetically different from the previous BCRA. This BCRA would still end the Medicaid program as we know it, revive discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions, send deductibles skyrocketing, result in plans offering bare-bones coverage, reduce women’s access to health care by stripping Planned Parenthood of Medicaid reimbursement, and make coverage in general less affordable for many North Carolinians.

In addition, a new amendment would reintroduce explicit discrimination against people with pre-existing conditions along with the sale of junk policies that offer bare-bones coverage. This amendment would segment the market, as lower-risk patients select cheap plans and older adults and people with pre-existing conditions seek out more robust and now much more expensive coverage—creating a de facto high risk pool. As this adverse selection continues, premiums would spiral out of control for more expensive patients who need comprehensive coverage, particularly for middle-class North Carolinians with pre-existing conditions who make too much to qualify for a subsidy under the new plan but would be denied coverage under a skimpy plan.

This amendment would destabilize the individual insurance market under the guise of providing consumer choice. But for aging North Carolinians and those with chronic and pre-existing conditions, the choice would be between paying sky-high premiums for coverage and making their rent or mortgage payment; between incurring major medical debt to afford their prescriptions and putting food on the table; and between drawing down on their savings to meet their deductible and saving for their children’s education.

Other changes designed to offset cuts to financial help do not go far enough.

Allowing consumers to use health savings accounts to pay insurance premiums would disproportionately benefit higher-income earners, doing little to make insurance affordable for consumers with low and moderate incomes.

Offering a little more money to states for stabilizing premiums—especially when the state has to contribute a significant match up to 35 percent—does not offset the massive cuts made to both Medicaid and subsidies that hundreds of thousands of North Carolinians rely on to afford their private plans.

No revisions in the bill help low-income North Carolinians afford their deductibles, which under the Senate plan will likely average above $6,000 a year.

Throwing a little money to states to address the opioid epidemic would not compensate for the draconian cuts to Medicaid, bare-bones plans not covering substance use disorder treatment, and millions of newly uninsured Americans unable to access the care they need.

The Congressional Budget Office found the previous iteration of the BCRA would leave 22 million Americans uninsured and gut Medicaid by cutting funding by 35 percent. While we do not yet have a score for the latest version, it is clear that this bill fails the test put forward by Senator Thom Tillis: the Better Care Reconciliation Act is nowhere close to being a “net improvement” over the Affordable Care Act.

Earth to the Senators Burr, Tillis and the rest of the Senate GOP:  You can’t make an ACA repeal proposal work without grievously harming your fellow citizens. Just stop. Now. Please.

Check Also

New Trump immigration proposal: Inhumane and incredibly costly

The Trump administration keeps cranking out reactionary and ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Chief US District Judge Terrence Boyle, a New Jersey-born jurist known for his bristly disposition a [...]

More than two dozen people crowded into a conference room at the North Carolina Judicial Center Wedn [...]

If North Carolina goes forward with the recommendation to allow a private charter operator to take c [...]

Early voting starts today, which means North Carolinians will finally get to decide on six proposed [...]

There are a lot of strange – even downright bizarre – aspects to the ongoing effort by North Carolin [...]

The power of the vote extends beyond any single electoral outcome. It has the potential to lift up i [...]

The post Nix all Six appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When lawmakers convene next week for a second special session of the North Carolina General Assembly [...]