Environment

DEQ delays water quality decision, dealing setback to Atlantic Coast Pipeline

Just a week ago, the utility companies behind the Atlantic Coast Pipeline had urged federal regulators to fast track their application, citing “contractual obligations.” Their letter claimed that “the state’s actions for water quality certifications and other state requirements are proceeding and align with our anticipated construction schedule.”

Apparently, that was merely wishful thinking.

The NC Department of Environmental Quality has delayed by three months its decision on whether to grant a 401 water quality and buffer permit to the owners of the ACP. In a letter to the ACP, state environmental officials laid out in two pages myriad missing information, some of it very basic: construction drawings, erosion control plans, a calculation of cumulative impacts and stream restoration plans.

DEQ had originally  set a deadline of Sept. 19 for the decision.

Southeast Energy News first reported the story this morning.

Given the ACP’s application history, it’s not surprising that vital data has still not been provided. Both the draft and final environmental impact statements, issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, contained large information gaps. In other cases, such as the environmental justice section, the issue was given short shrift, as if it were a box to be merely checked off.

The public has been overwhelmingly opposed to the project for environmental, safety and social justice reasons. Only economic boosters, local governments and the occasional industry front group in North Carolina have spoken for it.

The ACP’s letter to FERC noted that pipeline contractors wanted to begin tree-cutting in November. But in its letter to the ACP, state environmental officials warned that “you have no authorization” under state and federal regulations “for this activity and any work done within waters of the state or protected riparian buffers” would violate state law.

 

 

ACP RequestForAddInfo 09-14-17 by Lisa Sorg on Scribd

One Comment


  1. richard manyes

    September 17, 2017 at 6:49 am

    Guys – Duke wants this project – with Cooper – Duke gets this project. There will be some public “concessions” just like when Cooper “beats” some of Duke’s requested rate hikes down a bit – but it is all for show.

Check Also

Finally, here is a list of DEQ, DHHS Science Advisory Board members — and it’s impressive

Toxicologists, ecologists, air quality experts and public health ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Jim Womack has a reputation in North Carolina for being many things, but a conservationist isn’t one [...]

Just days after a North Carolina official tapped a Robeson County elementary for a controversial cha [...]

Two groups seeking state contracts to run struggling North Carolina schools have professional ties t [...]

North Carolinians will lose their “precious right to vote,” as U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader [...]

Budgets matter, both within government and inside each household across America, because they demons [...]

Why the legislature now operates this way and why it’s a big problem The North Carolina General Asse [...]

The post NCAA Legitimacy Deflated appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

There are lots of reasons for people to get off of the sidelines and commit themselves to new and su [...]

Featured | Special Projects

NC Budget 2017
The maze of the NC Budget is complex. Follow the stories to follow the money.
Read more


NC Redistricting 2017
New map, new districts, new lawmakers. Here’s what you need to know about gerrymandering in NC.
Read more