Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Berger appoints mostly GOP committee to look at judicial reform, redistricting

Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger, whose chief of staff has been pushing a “merit” judicial section plan, has named a majority Republican committee to review judicial reform and redistricting.

Senators Dan Bishop (R-Mecklenburg), Warren Daniel (R-Burke) and Bill Rabon (R-Bladen) are co-chairs of the select committee on judicial reform and redistricting.

Rabon introduced a Constitutional amendment last week that would reform the judiciary by cutting all judgeship terms to two years and forcing all of the state’s judges to run for re-election next year.

The co-chairs are three of 10 Republican Senators names to the committee. The others are Dan Barrett (R-Davie), Chuck Edwards (R-Buncombe), Ralph Hise (R-Madison), Wesley Meredith (R-Cumberland), Paul Newton (R-Cabbarrus), Shirley Randleman (R-Stokes) and Norman Sanderson (R-Carteret).

Hise is currently under investigation for irregularities in his campaign finance reports.

There were five Democratic Senators appointed to the committee. They are Dan Blue (D-Wake), Jay Chaudhuri (D-Wake), Joel Ford (D-Mecklenburg), Floyd McKissick (D-Durham) and Terry Van Duyn (D-Buncombe).

In a statement, Berger said that the last 60 years has provided “haphazard and sometimes contradictory changes” to the state’s judiciary, and that he hopes Senators can have “thoughtful dialogue” on how to modernize, reform and strengthen the system.

”The judiciary touches every North Carolinian, so the conversation needs to include Republicans and Democrats, judges, legislators, district attorneys, clerks of court, executive branch officials, men and women of all races, and yes, even lawyers,” Berger wrote. “This committee will carefully consider all options on how we select judges, including the House’s judicial redistricting bill, merit selection models, retention elections, and, if we maintain a system of elections, their frequency and partisan structure.”

His hope is that the committee will meet a consensus on a recommendation to “modernize and strengthen” the courts.

One Comment


  1. Alan Falk

    October 26, 2017 at 1:17 am

    “Rabon introduced a Constitutional amendment last week that would reform the judiciary by cutting all judgeship terms to two years and forcing all of the state’s judges to run for re-election next year.” ???

    First, as I recently posted, this puts the Judiciary at the whim of the party in the Governor’s Mansion or the Majority in the State Houses… and that’s stupid and if anything, the terms of the judges should be LENGTHENED to span at least three or four Gubernatorial cycles to make such political influences impossible!

    Second… if the bill doesn’t describe EXPLICITLY, what “merit” means, how it will evaluated and with transparency, the goal and implementation boil down to more Gerrymandering and what’s affectionately known as “BS.”

Check Also

Now that new maps are enacted, political scientist Bitzer takes a look at partisan data

North Carolina lawmakers have enacted new remedial maps ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

If there is a strategy to President Trump’s administration – and really, who knows if there is? – it [...]

Congressional testimony this week by DuPont, Chemours and 3M was damning Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schul [...]

State environmental regulators will have the power to require most composting facilities to test for [...]

A few short years ago, Lakewood Elementary School in Durham was a low-performing school where only o [...]

It’s September and America’s school children are back in class. They’re greeted every day with the u [...]

Powerful new research confirms numerous benefits of substantially increasing public investments For [...]

The confluence of three essentially unprecedented events combined to make last week an extraordinary [...]

The post The two faces of the NC GOP appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]