Commentary

“Speculative” injuries for trans people, huh? What Berger and Moore need to remember about civil rights

As this morning’s edition of the Weekly Briefing makes clear, conservative politicians and activists in North Carolina are not about to ease up in their war on LGBT equality. Just read the remarkable statements uttered by North Carolina’s reactionary Lieutenant Governor and the head of the badly-misnamed NC Values Coalition (both of which are reproduced in the column) to get a sense of how low some badly confused souls are willing to stoop.

All that being said, the statement submitted by a lawyers working for Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger and House Speaker Tim Moore as they argued against recent actions taken by Governor Cooper and Attorney General Stein to chip away at state-sanctioned discrimination may have hit a new low. This is from the Associated Press account of the Berger-Moore team’s argument before a federal judge in which they contended against the idea of protecting transgender people from discrimination in access to public facilities:

“The plaintiffs’ claimed injuries are speculative,’ lawyers Robert Potter Jr. and Kyle Duncan wrote on behalf of the GOP leaders to Schroeder. ‘It is unclear whether any plaintiff will ever be injured in any way arising from using the facilities in question.'”

Did you get that? “Speculative,” huh? By such “logic” it would be “speculative” as to whether people of color were injured by being denied to “whites only” drinking fountains and restrooms during Jim Crow. It would be “speculative” as to whether Jews and Italians were injured by employers who refused to hire them because of their ethnic heritage in early 20th Century America.

Earth to Phil Berger, Tim Moore and crew: It is not “speculative” as to whether transgender North Carolinians have been, are or will be injured by policies that deny them access to restrooms corresponding with their gender identity. Indeed, it is so obvious that one need not read the reams of heartbreaking testimonials that have arisen in the public sphere in the past few years to grasp it. Simply put, when a person cannot pee in peace and comfort due to discriminatory policies implemented by government or private actors engaged in public commerce that causes an injury, guys — a very serious and tangible injury, i.e. physical and emotional pain.

And if you can’t grasp that simple and as-plain-as-the-nose-on-your-face fact, it must be concluded that the notion that either of you possesses any measure of basic empathy for your fellow human beings is, at best, speculative.

Check Also

Editorials: Trump backs down, but GOP continues to block real immigration solutions

Be sure to check out the editorials from ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

GOP lawmakers want North Carolinians to make sweeping, permanent changes to the state Constitution a [...]

The lump started small and hid behind her ear. Harmless, the doctor said, nothing to worry about. So [...]

The Senate voted along party lines Tuesday night to overturn a partial judicial redistricting bill i [...]

Viola Williams has been crunching numbers and working out possible solutions since last week, when t [...]

From 1999-2016, opioid-related overdose fatalities increased by more than 800 percent in North Carol [...]

Would that North Carolina lawmakers had been so direct as “Pitchfork Ben” Tillman, a virulent white [...]

“I’m speechless.” So began the heartfelt lament of Rep. Verla Insko (D-Orange) late last Friday afte [...]

The post SB 711 – The pig’s roast appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]