Commentary

This morning’s “must read” editorial

Be sure to check out this morning’s lead editorial in Raleigh’s News & Observer, which is based in large measure on the reporting of Policy Watch’s award-winning Environmental Reporter, Lisa Sorg. As Sorg reported earlier this week, North Carolina’s latest proposed animal waste rules — an area already poorly regulated — pose numerous potential problems for the environment.

Here’s the N&O in “Bar set too low on NC hog waste”:

“At issue is the seemingly eternal question about rules related to hog farms and poultry farms: At what point are stronger rules needed to minimize the impact of waste disposal – that impact being odor in nearby communities and the aging of waste lagoons that can result in a sort of leakage into lakes, streams, rivers and other types of wetlands?

Those who favor limited rules argue current regulations are adequate because the waste, some of which is used as fertilizer, doesn’t enter waterways or wetlands. It’s called ‘non-discharge,’ which means rules are viewed, by environmentalists, as not as strong as those governing the discharge of waste into those lakes and rivers.

But, says Will Hendrick, manager of the Waterkeeper Alliance’s Pure Farms/Pure Waters campaign, “We believe it’s legal fiction that they are non-discharge operations. Some modicum of monitoring is appropriate.”

Lisa Sorg of the excellent public interest advocacy group NC Policy Watch reported the issue recently. And the monitoring that Hendrick is talking about, she wrote, is not happening because ‘since this wastewater is classified as “non-discharge,” it’s not subject to air, surface water or groundwater monitoring or enforcement. And what you don’t look for, you can’t find.’”

After explaining that the opposition to strong rules is driven by those who worry about harming the economy, the editorial ends this way:

“The problem is, good regulation isn’t about hurting industry; it’s about protecting finite natural resources that once spoiled will not come back. Water is one. But livability is another. When the odor from hog farm operations makes it difficult for neighbors, it also makes it difficult for an area to attract other types of industry. And, most important, if in the name of prosperity and deregulation (two things that don’t necessarily go together), water resources, ultimately drinking water resources, are put at risk by wastewater runoff or even a spill that amounts to an environmental catastrophe, the economic consequences for a region will be long-lasting if not permanent.

It’s wise to look skeptically at any attempts to weaken environmental regulation, because changes should have a high bar to clear. In North Carolina, under Republicans determined to deregulate virtually everything, that bar has been set way too low.”

Click here to access all of Sorg’s remarkable collection of environmental stories.

Check Also

New report: Amazon a top employer of food assistance recipients

Good lord — maybe this is why Amazon ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

“I could choose to do anything else with $50.” But Anca Stefan, a high school English teacher in a D [...]

The Cape Fear River is damaged, contaminated by decades of human malfeasance, negligence and ignoran [...]

Legislative Services Officer Paul Coble appears to be violating the state public records law and is [...]

This morning, the state Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the pivotal case of Silver, et al. [...]

These are extraordinary times in the American experiment with representative democracy. In Washingto [...]

Public education in North Carolina has its share of challenges, not the least of which has been the [...]

The post Time to come clean appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Tax Day in 2018 in North Carolina presents an opportunity to make sure our tax code allows us to mee [...]

Now hiring

NC Policy Watch is now hiring a Managing Editor – click here for more info.