SCSJ’s Anita Earls to run for NC Supreme Court seat in 2018 election

Anita Earls, a civil rights attorney and founding Executive Director of the Southern Coalition for Social Justice, announced she would run for a seat on the state Supreme Court. (Photo by Melissa Boughton)

A prominent civil rights attorney announced Wednesday morning that she will make a bid to move to the other side of the bench next year.

Anita Earls, who is the Executive Director of the Southern Coalition for Social Justice (SCSJ), will run for a North Carolina Supreme Court seat in the 2018 election, challenging incumbent Justice Barbara Jackson, who is a registered Republican. Jackson’s eight-year term ends next year.

Earls, 57 of Durham, made the announcement at the Democratic Party headquarters on Hillsborough Street.

“In light of recent attacks on the independence of North Carolina’s judiciary, and on the right of all citizens to cast a ballot that is counted equally, it is clear to me that I have to not just talk the talk, but also must have the courage to walk the walk,” she said. “I understand the difference between being an advocate and being a jurist, and I want the opportunity to use my experience to help ensure equal justice for all North Carolinians in a new role.”

Prior to founding SCSJ, Earls was director of advocacy at the UNC Center for Civil Rights and director of the Voting Rights Project at the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, according to her online biographical information. She was a deputy assistant attorney general in the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice during the Clinton Administration.

SCSJ will continue on, Earls said.

“I am so proud of the Southern Coalition,” she said. “We have strong leadership. The Board is engaging in an appropriate transition process and I’m just excited to see the things that they’ll be able to accomplish in the next 10 years.”

Earls has also served on the Equal Access to Justice Commission and the North Carolina Board of Elections. She has taught at Duke University, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and the University of Maryland.

She is the lead attorney in North Carolina v. Covington, the state’s ongoing racial gerrymandering case, and for the League of Women Voters in a partisan gerrymandering case that went to trial last month in a federal court. She also led a challenge in state court to uphold North Carolinians’ right to vote even without a photo ID.

Earls will phase out her role in the ongoing cases by the end of the year so that she can campaign, she said. She said the qualification she hopes voters will evaluate most is whether she can fairly and faithfully apply the law equally to everyone whose case comes before the Supreme Court.

“I believe my record demonstrates that I have an unflinching dedication to the principle of equality before the law,” she added.

She noted later that she had sued Democrats and Republicans alike in the past.

Former North Carolina Gov. Jim Hunt and current U.S. Rep. G.K. Butterfield released statements endorsing Earls.

“Anita’s service to North Carolina is undeniable,” Hunt said. “She has been at the forefront of the fight for fair maps and voting rights in our state, and she has dedicated her life to achieving fairness, equality, and justice. I look forward to supporting Anita as she seeks to represent all North Carolinians from the bench of North Carolina’s Supreme Court.”

Butterfield said Earls has the intellect and integrity needed on North Carolina State Supreme Court.

“She understands the importance of an independent judiciary and will be a justice that will only make decisions based on the facts and the law,” he added. “As a former N. C. State Supreme Court Justice, I know Anita has the character and work ethic to serve with distinction. Anita will make us proud.”

Lawmakers have been taking aim at the independence of the judiciary in the last year. They passed measures that require judges and justices to run for election using party labels. After Justice Mike Morgan’s win in the 2016 election, the state Supreme Court was tipped to a 4-3 Democratic majority.

There was also a bill passed in the most recent special session that eliminates judicial primaries next year, which means anyone who meets state requirements to run for a Supreme Court seat can be put on the 2018 ballot. Jackson has already established her bid for reelection and Earls is the only other candidate thus far to announce her plans to run for the seat.

The last time a judicial primary was eliminated for a North Carolina Supreme Court seat was in November 2004. Justice Paul Newby won over seven other candidates with 22.59 percent of the vote, according to the State Board of Elections and Ethics Enforcement.

The candidate filing period for all 2018 judicial offices is from noon on June 18 to noon on June 29.

There are other changes that could be made before next year’s elections, including a potential merit selection plan that the Senate has been touting. Earls said the voters will ultimately make the decision about how judges are selected.

“I think it is so important that voters decide who our judges are, not politicians,” Earls said.

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

With nearly 200 active COVID cases among students and staff, board will revisit mask mandate Monday [...]

Like millions of women, Sarah Anderson saw her income drop during the pandemic when her two part-tim [...]

Proposals would fund universal pre-K and free community college, hasten shift to renewable energy WA [...]

Last week, the Prison Policy Initiative published a report – "States of Incarceration: The Glob [...]

Vaccine refusal is a major reason COVID-19 infections continue to surge in the U.S. Safe and effecti [...]

Abortion is a common and normal part of the range of reproductive healthcare services that people ha [...]

Zac Campbell paused suddenly and took a minute to gather himself, while colleagues shuffled toward h [...]

Read the story by reporter Lisa Sorg here. The post Clear and present danger: Burlington’s Tarheel A [...]

A Clear and Present Danger


NC’s Tarheel Army Missile Plant is a toxic disgrace
Read the two-part story about the Army’s failure to clean up hazardous chemicals, which have contaminated a Black and Hispanic neighborhood for 30 years.

Read in English.

Haga clic aquí para leer: Peligro inminente
Una antigua planta de misiles del Ejército ha contaminado un vecindario negro y latino durante 30 años.

Leer en español.