Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Democrats protest Senate committee meeting after GOP ‘silences’ Governor’s speaker

GOP lawmakers proved again Wednesday that when it comes to Gov. Roy Cooper, they aren’t afraid to flex their political muscle. Democratic lawmakers proved they have had enough.

The Senate Select Committee on Judicial Reform and Redistricting met Wednesday for the last time this year to hear from the Governor’s Office and a representative from Elon University School of Law about judicial selection. They were also set to discuss the House’s judicial redistricting plan, according to the public agenda.

After starting almost an hour late, the Committee immediately denied Cooper’s designee, retired Judge Don Stephens, a change to speak because he didn’t work for the Executive branch of government, prompting Democratic senators to walk out in protest.

After hearing from Elon’s Scott Gaylord, GOP senators ended the meeting by introducing their own judicial redistricting maps, which, like the House’s maps, were drawn in secret and not released to the public or Democrats until the last minute.

“After today, I don’t have a great reason to have great optimism,” said Sen. Floyd McKissick Jr. (D-Durham). “When a Governor has designated a person to come and articulate the Executive branch’s thoughts and positions on the issues that are before this committee … the person should at least be allowed to speak, to be heard, to have those views and opinions respected.”

Cooper appointed Stephens, who has more than 30 years experience on the bench, to “discuss matters both from the perspective of the Governor and from the trial bench,” according to a letter the Governor’s Office sent lawmakers before the meeting.

Committee members invited the Governor to participate the day before the meeting. Ford Porter, a spokesman for the Governor, released the following statement after the meeting:

“This legislature wants to take over the courts for political purposes and is threatening an independent judiciary. They fear a distinguished jurist like Judge Stephens would shine a light on what they are trying to do. He should have been allowed to speak.”

New judicial redistricting maps released Wednesday by Senate lawmakers

Stephens said he was not surprised the committee did not let him speak.

“They probably knew that my remarks would be critical and raise questions about the legitimacy of the purported purpose of the hearing,” he wrote in an email. “Their refusal to allow me to speak probably spoke louder than anything I might have said.”

He passed along the comments he would have made had he been allowed to speak.

“Where is any evidence that the quality and integrity of this state’s judiciary is so poor that the constitution of North Carolina must be immediately drastically changed?” he wrote in his remarks. “Who has declared the emergency? On what basis?”

Stephens would have questioned whether the motivation behind lawmakers’ efforts to reform the judiciary had anything to do with some judges have disagreed in their decisions with the legislature.

“The fact that we are having this conversation impugns the integrity of every sitting judge in North Carolina, be they Republican or Democrat, because it suggests that there is something lacking in the quality of their work without any evidence to support that accusation or that unfounded assumption,” he would have said.

Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger criticized Democrats after the meeting on Twitter and called their protest a political stunt.

“To date, the Senate has held more than 14 hours of hearings and debates, incorporating ideas from across the political spectrum and from many groups impacted by changes to our judicial system,” he wrote. “This is a serious effort to address the constitutional problems with the current plan and the House proposal.”

Sen. Dan Bishop (R-Mecklenburg), who is a co-chair of the Committee, introduced the new maps at the meeting, noting that they would correct constitutional issues in the House maps. He said in drawing the new maps that they did not consider racial data and did not try to maximize partisan gain.

Districts were redrawn in the following counties: Buncombe, Cumberland, Durham, Guilford, Forsyth, Mecklenburg and Wake.

Rep. Justin Burr (R-Montgomery, Stanly) said after the meeting that he was aware of the new maps and that the Senate built on the maps he drew. 

Rep. Justin Burr

Rep. Justin Burr

“They’re just continuing to build off needed reforms,” Burr said of the Senate maps. “I think there’s continued improvements, and I’m sure there will be some areas where there will be slight disagreements, but I can’t point any out at this time.”

Burr described the changes as minor.

“There are a couple of differences in it, but it’s nothing that kind of blows the whole plan out of the water,” he said.

Burr added that he’s very optimistic about the General Assembly’s opportunity to pass judicial redistricting.

McKissick said he believes the legislature will also move toward a merit selection plan that “puts the General Assembly in the driver’s seat in some form or another.”

“We have attended the committee meetings on judicial reform in good faith based on Republican leaderships’ statements that they want a thorough and inclusive process that results in meaningful reform,” he said. “What we witnessed in today’s meeting shows us clearly that Republicans are paying lip service to the democratic process and have no intention of truly taking other professional and public perspectives into account.”

Members of the public can weigh in on the Senate committee’s judicial reform considerations here.


  1. Kathy Vowell

    December 14, 2017 at 1:33 pm

    The type of stunts this state house is pulling is one more reason so many will vote DEMOCRAT In 2018. You REPUBLICANS have taken that extra rope and figuratively hung yourselves. You are going to have to live with the results. You SHOULD HAVE listened to the Judge.

  2. Clarence Sell

    December 14, 2017 at 7:56 pm

    All the absurdly bad control the GOP is currently amassing in the legislature will be in good hands after the 2018 Democratic takeover. The more of this they do, the more they guarantee that takeover.

Check Also

NC Court of Appeals throws out voter photo ID for now, says law likely passed with discriminatory intent

A three-judge North Carolina Court of Appeals panel ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

"Satirical" Facebook site seeks to promote Trump's re-election When Jonathan Jones sa [...]

Not everyone in North Carolina understands the implications of court fines and fees and how expenses [...]

A government budget not only details a state or nation’s financial priorities, but also serves as a [...]

When Billy Lassiter was 12 years old, he sat in the front row of one of his seventh grade classes su [...]

Say this for North Carolina House Speaker Tim Moore and his surrogates, they are determined con arti [...]

The lengths to which conservative ideologues and members of the Trump cult will go in order to avoid [...]

The post Causey & effect (with Lt. Gov. Dan Forest) appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

For a man who knew everybody, Greg Lindberg might seem in the coming days like a man who knew nobody [...]