News

The link between conservative professors advising UNC Board of Governors

In the last few weeks, the UNC Board of Governors has been looking for advice on promoting intellectual diversity and civil discourse on campuses.

Specifically, the board has looked for that advice from two prominent conservative professors from private schools whose work and academic centers are funded by conservative foundations openly engaged in a political culture war.

Regular readers of the Progressive Pulse will remember James Otteson, professor at Wake Forest University, from a previous piece by Rob Schofield.

That piece concentrated primarily on Otteson’s connections to the Koch Brothers’ Charles Koch Foundation.

It’s also worth looking at Otteson’s connection to the Thomas W. Smith Foundation.

The Smith Foundation counts among its board members James Piereson, the former director of the John M. Olin Foundation.

Piereson and the Olin Foundation are two interesting links between Otteson and Robert George, the conservative professor from Princeton hosted by the board at its meeting last week.

While heading up the Olin Foundation, Piereson wrote a very frank 2005 essay about the best ways for conservative funders to establish “beachheads” of conservative thought at universities, to maintain outside influence on them and circumvent concerns about academic freedom – all to promote conservative values and ideals and bring the “house of cards” of traditional academia crashing down.

Critics of the UNC Board of Governors’ recent direction on these issues – which includes a number of student and faculty groups – say if the board is actually concerned with intellectual diversity and civil discourse, it may need to cast its net a little wider than the most conservative professors and programs they can find, set on private university campuses, funded by private conservative organizations.

One Comment


  1. Kevin McCormick

    December 22, 2017 at 10:40 am

    What’s your concern here? That the ‘liberal’ stranglehold on higher education might actually be loosened to allow for dissenting thinkers? For at least five decades there has been an unwritten policy to weed out all academic voices which do not worship at the altar of ‘progressive’ thought. Believe it or not, there are other people in the world who are quite intelligent but who believe that, at the very least, to have a conversation about ideas there should be a legitimate balance of voices. Students should have an opportunity to actually decide for themselves the best answers to the great questions of life and they can’t do that if they continually hear one only side of the arguments. What this brief article reveals is that those professors who do not pass the liberal bias test have to find creative ways to have any presence at all on college campuses.

Check Also

Former ECU Interim Chancellor Dan Gerlach announces new lobbyist position

Dan Gerlach, the embattled former interim chancellor of ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Law "is clear" Rep. Holly Grange should have reported on businesses owned by her husband e [...]

More than two decades after a landmark state Supreme Court ruling, NC moves a step closer to assurin [...]

Last summer, Chemours sent contractors to the Cumberland County home of Katrina Rubiera and tested h [...]

Today is Martin Luther King Jr. Day, a national holiday to honor and celebrate the life of the civil [...]

If North Carolina Republicans are confounded by the notion that every last one of them disdains publ [...]

As we commemorated the 46th anniversary of the historic Supreme Court decision Roe v Wade last year, [...]

And just like that, another critical election year is upon us – maybe the most important election ye [...]

The post An apple for teacher. appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]