Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Republicans set conditions for Democrats who requested speakers at judicial reform meeting

Senators Dan Bishop, Warren Daniel and Bill Rabon

The Republican lawmakers who head up a committee on judicial reform and redistricting have responded to Democrats’ recent request for certain speakers with their own set of demands.

Senators Terry Van Duyn, Floyd McKissick, Joel Ford and Jay Chaudhuri wrote a letter last week asking for seven speakers to appear at the Jan. 3 meeting “to hear from different perspectives and viewpoints.”

Committee chairmen Senators Dan Bishop, Warren Daniel and Bill Rabon, all Republicans, responded with two conditions that Democrats must meet before speakers who agree to appear can participate.

“One, you secure the Governor’s commitment to testify or send his General Counsel to share and answer questions about his views on judicial selection and redistricting, at the same meeting,” their letter states. “Two, you commit in writing by tomorrow to stay for the whole meeting and to offer a proposed map fixing the current unconstitutional judicial districts and your recommended changes, if any, to the judicial selection process, at the same meeting. We also will enter into the record the prepared speech of retired Judge [Don] Stephens, from whom in retrospect we should have heard on December 13.”

Gov. Roy Cooper sent Stephens to the last meeting to speak for him and the committee chairmen denied him a chance to participate because he did not work for the Executive Branch. Democrats protested by leaving the meeting early.

It was not immediately clear how Democratic senators responded to the letter, but a spokesperson said in an email that some of the conditions could not reasonably be met.

“Regardless of the terms of these conditions, it struck us that requests for information by committee members should not be conditional,” wrote Leslie Rudd, communications director for Sen. Dan Blue’s office.

One Comment


  1. Scott Bryan

    December 28, 2017 at 2:22 pm

    Who determined the districts were unconstitutional?

Check Also

Democracy NC reports: Early voter turnout rising

Democracy North Carolina is studying early voting every ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Early voting has begun, and North Carolinians are turning out in droves at the polls. It’s a big yea [...]

Chief US District Judge Terrence Boyle, a New Jersey-born jurist known for his bristly disposition a [...]

More than two dozen people crowded into a conference room at the North Carolina Judicial Center Wedn [...]

If North Carolina goes forward with the recommendation to allow a private charter operator to take c [...]

It’s one of the great ironies of modern American politics that it is so-called “conservatives” who h [...]

The post Night of the Living Dead Issue appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

On Monday night of this week, acclaimed education researcher Richard Rothstein spoke to community me [...]

There are a lot of strange – even downright bizarre – aspects to the ongoing effort by North Carolin [...]