Courts & the Law, Defending Democracy, News

Lawmakers request help from SCOTUS after ‘disruptive’ partisan gerrymandering ruling

The U.S. Supreme Court should step in to halt a lower court’s partisan gerrymandering ruling in North Carolina because of an “eleventh-hour disruption,” according to an emergency document filed Friday.

The U.S. District Court this week struck down the state’s 2016 congressional map as an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. It also ordered that lawmakers redraw the map within two weeks and stated that it intends to appoint a special master to draw an alternate in case their plan does not pass muster.

The 200-plus page court order cites lawmakers’ overt partisan intent as the foundation for violations of the Equal Protections Clause, the First Amendment and Article I of the U.S. Constitution.

Lawmakers took issue in the emergency application for stay with both the three-judge panel’s “theories of partisan gerrymandering” and their decision to hire a special master at the same time they ordered the legislature to redraw the map.

“In sum, the three-judge panel has used an entirely novel legal theory to hopelessly disrupt North Carolina’s upcoming congressional elections,” the document states.

The majority opinion was written by Judge James Wynn, a President Barack Obama appointee, and joined by Judge Earl Britt, appointed by Jimmy Carter. Judge William Osteen, a George W. Bush appointee, wrote a separate opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.

They contend that the decision is “all the more problematic because it will inevitably interfere with North Carolina’s congressional election cycle.” Candidate filing opens Feb. 12 and runs through the end of the month.

“If the 2018 election must proceed under a map other than the one that governed the 2016 congressional elections, then the Board of Elections needs lead to time assign voters to their new districts, potential candidates need lead time to evaluate the new map and make filing decisions, and voters need lead time to understand where they will be voting and for whom,” the motion states.

Lawmakers suggest that the more “sensible course” is to stay the federal court’s decision until the U.S. Supreme Court makes its decision in a separate partisan gerrymandering case out of Wisconsin, Gill v. Whitford. The Gill decision could have sweeping consequences for redistricting processes across the nation.

They request a ruling from the highest court by Jan. 22. You can read the full motion below.

Motion for Stay by NC Policy Watch on Scribd

Check Also

Report: NC receives failing grade in response to COVID-19 in jails

In a report released this month, the ACLU ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Julia Pimentel Gudiel came to North Carolina from Guatemala for her children. While her four kids st [...]

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday upheld a Trump administration effort to exempt empl [...]

Last semester, as the COVID-19 pandemic closed all UNC System campuses, Samantha Pilot welcomed her [...]

After years of effort, opponents of the cancelled Atlantic Coast Pipeline celebrate, reflect and loo [...]

CHAPEL HILL – Several of my White friends and colleagues have asked me recently what changes are req [...]

For the past month, there has been much said about the current racial climate in America. The eyes o [...]

If ever there was a year in which it is a good thing to be past the midway point, 2020 would appear [...]

The post Bottom Lines Matter appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]