News

Committee on Confederate monuments begins work

The N.C. Historical Commission’s committee on confederate monuments held its first meeting Monday afternoon by teleconference, setting goals and discussing how to tackle the controversial issue.

Back in September, the full commission put off a decision on removing three Confederate monuments from the State Capitol grounds. Instead, it formed a five-person committee to study the politically fraught issue, which the North Carolina General Assembly dropped into their laps with a 2015 law that makes it more difficult to remove such statues.

The committee consists of:

  • Chris Fonvielle, an associate professor of history at the University of North Carolina Wilmington.
  • Valerie Johnson, the Mott Distinguished Professor of Women’s Studies and Director of Africana Women’s Studies at Greensboro’s Bennett College and chair of the North Carolina African American Heritage Commission.
  • Noah Reynolds, a real estate investor and entrepreneur and trustee of the Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation.
  • Sam Dixon, an attorney and preservation advocate from Edenton.
  • David Ruffin, a banker and chairman of the commission.

During Monday’s initial meeting, the committee laid out its goals. Among them:

1) Seeking legal input from the law schools at Duke University, Elon University, N.C. Central, UNC-Chapel Hill, Wake Forest University, Campbell University and from the UNC School of government.

2) Seeking outside input from historical experts, including David Cecelski, a North Carolina historian whose award-winning work on race in North Carolina has often touched on the Civil War and reconstruction era. The committee is also seeking input from historians at the state’s historically black colleges and universities and the Civil War and Reconstruction history museum now being planned in Fayetteville.

3) Creating a web portal for public comment, which they will also accept via traditional mail and holding at least one public forum before they present their work to the full commission.

“I think the state of NC deserves the rationale behind any decision and so it’s not just a public hearing but also explaining,” Ruffin said. “I absolutely feel a public hearing is quite critical to our mission.”

The committee has not yet set its next meeting date, but hopes to do so soon.

 

 

One Comment


  1. David Z Smoak

    January 25, 2018 at 1:15 pm

    I am not a native NC citizen, but I have lived here for over seven years after retiring from the Army. I am not emotionally involved in this debate, so both sides can attack me, lol. I would like two questions addressed by the Commission before any vote on removing statues is made. 1. Do Union states have Civil War memorials and how do they differ from the questionable NC ones? 2. What is the possibility of adding statues honoring the sacrifices of Union soldiers in the same area as the Confederates to “offset” the perceived racist message of Confederate-only memorials?

Check Also

Pfizer to pay $40,000 civil penalty for campaign contribution violations

This week Pfizer, Inc. came to an agreement ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

Chief US District Judge Terrence Boyle, a New Jersey-born jurist known for his bristly disposition a [...]

More than two dozen people crowded into a conference room at the North Carolina Judicial Center Wedn [...]

If North Carolina goes forward with the recommendation to allow a private charter operator to take c [...]

Early voting starts today, which means North Carolinians will finally get to decide on six proposed [...]

There are a lot of strange – even downright bizarre – aspects to the ongoing effort by North Carolin [...]

The power of the vote extends beyond any single electoral outcome. It has the potential to lift up i [...]

The post Nix all Six appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When lawmakers convene next week for a second special session of the North Carolina General Assembly [...]