News

New Elon poll shows views on $5 billion Amazon project

Last week the Elon University Poll took a look at enthusiasm and support for a second Amazon headquarters in the 19 locations in 16 U.S. metros competing for the $5 billion project.

The project, which could employ as many as 50,000, has the potential for a huge economic impact. It’s also become a bit of a political football.

The competition for a new headquarters has thrown light on the fact that the tech company is a top employer of food assistance recipients.

It’s also reignited debates about state LGBTQ protections as the company has said it is limiting its criteria to states that have such laws.

The Elon poll found “strong support” for the project from 43 percent of the North Carolinians surveyed — well behind sites like Indianapolis, Pittsburgh and Atlanta, where “strong support” was at over 50 percent.

From the Elon release on the results:

“The balance between cheerleaders and opponents is key to how a major change is received within a community. While a majority in all of the HQ2 finalist regions support Amazon moving to town, some areas had more cheerleaders and fewer opponents,” says Jason Husser, director of the Elon Poll and assistant professor of political science. “Our results suggest Amazon should expect Pittsburgh, Atlanta and Indianapolis to be particularly rich with advocates. Conversely, executives should have at least some reason for pause about the potential for opposition groups emerging in Austin and Denver.”

The survey also explored public appetite for large-scale incentives packages and the perceived impact from such a large-scale project as the Amazon headquarters on the local community in terms of real estate costs, cost of living and wages. It asked whether residents want what promises to be an expansive Amazon campus in the suburbs or downtown.

Read the full results of the poll with info on methodology here.

Check Also

State Board of Elections delays Hise hearing, will hear other interesting cases

Wednesday’s meeting of the state Board of Elections ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

The legislature expedited its first round of disaster relief funding for the state's critical r [...]

The following set of figures comes from the Center on Budget & Policy Priorities' new repor [...]

For more than four months, the Guilford County school system failed to disclose critical information [...]

If Janice Franklin has an extra $10 to spare, she’s not thinking about using it to buy a photo ident [...]

There are a lot of strange – even downright bizarre – aspects to the ongoing effort by North Carolin [...]

The power of the vote extends beyond any single electoral outcome. It has the potential to lift up i [...]

The post Nix all Six appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

When lawmakers convene next week for a second special session of the North Carolina General Assembly [...]