NC Budget and Tax Center, News

Without coming right out and saying it, proposed budget could kill light rail in North Carolina

A single sentence buried on page 179 of the budget bill could effectively kill light rail in North Carolina by creating a kind of Catch-22 for transportation officials.

The seemly innocuous passage reads: “A light rail project is ineligible for scoring, prioritization, and State funding until a written agreement is provided to the Department establishing that all non-State funding necessary to construct the project has been secured.”

While this may not seem so bad on the surface of things, these few words could make it practically impossible to build light rail systems to serve North Carolina’s booming metropolitan areas. Because the state generally must provide matching funds to access federal grants for light rail, this provision could make it impossible to draw down the federal dollars that are available for these kinds of projects. If the provision is not fixed, federal funds would likely flow to other states while North Carolina communities that want light rail would have little recourse.

The provision also flies in the face of legislative leaders’ stated goal of removing politics from transportation investments. In 2013, the legislature created a new system for making Strategic Transportation Investments, a system that was meant to make transportation choices more evidence- and need-based. While defending the plan, Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger outlined his desire to “be sure that our process is one that’s not political, it should be one that is data driven, focuses on prioritization and encourages planning.” By those standards, the proposed budget language would be a disaster. It would prevent cities from planning for their current and future transportation needs and reinserts politics into the heart of mass transit investments.

Forestalling light rail is also bad for working North Carolinians that lack reliable vehicles of their own. As our cities grow, many low-income residents are being forced to move farther and farther from their places of employment, and expanded mass transit options are vital to closing that gap. Light rail is not the answer everywhere, but it can be a vital piece of the solution in many communities.

Finally, this proposal could make it harder for North Carolina to compete for the jobs of the future. Technology-heavy companies know that many of the people they want as employees like using mass transit, particularly in densely populated urban areas. Relying on cars is already burdensome in some of our state’s biggest cities, and only likely to get worse as these areas continue to grow. North Carolina has been able to compete for many of these jobs based on the low cost of living, at least compared to places like San Francisco and Boston, but as it becomes more expensive to live in our state’s major cities, amenities like light rail will become increasingly important to landing the jobs of today and tomorrow.

Even though the budget will likely pass without the opportunity for amendment, there is still time fix this particular problem. The provision could be removed when the legislature works up a “technical corrections” bill, and that would help keep transportation investments rooted in the kinds of 21st Century options we truly need.

Patrick McHugh is an Economic Analyst for the Budget & Tax Center, a project of the North Carolina Justice Center.

One Comment


  1. Bonnie Hauser

    May 31, 2018 at 8:29 am

    This column is sadly misleading. While I’m not happy about the legislature’s approach to the budget, I was equally unhappy when the progressive democrats in Durham and Orange MPO put most of the Triangle’s bus and BRT projects in the region on a back burner so that they wouldn’t compete with DOLRT for funding. So much for taking politics out of the STIP program.

    As far as low income people, DOLRT does not serve them. It serves UNC and downtown Durham, and the luxury condominiums along the way. Gentrification along the corridor is already displacing low income families. In the latest transit plan planned improvements to bus service have been cut by 25%.The rest have been delayed via the MPO antics above. Given the University-centric bus system that exists today, low income families rely on multiple connections and long waits to use the bus system. And if their shift starts early or ends late, there is no service at all

    The costs for DOLRT are so high, that the proposed commuter rail – which could have served many more people at a lower cost, and done more to alleviate traffic (including NC 147) – has been put on indefinite hold awaiting funding. The project costs, which have more than doubled from $1.4 billion to $3.3 billion will tie up our transit dollars for decades. Local costs have increased from $$350 million to $1.8 billion – introducing unprecedented financial risk for Durham and Orange citizens.

    To me, the worst part is since DOLRT will tie up local funds for so long, it prevents Orange and Durham from participating in truly progressive transportation systems that reach out to every community. Bus Rapid Transit and high frequency bus service on high traffic corridors combined with ride-sharing fleets that reach into communities offer more flexible cost effective systems that would position us for growth. Wake County is pursuing all of these options to serve the fastest growing segment of the Triangle. They can afford it because they opted out of LRT.

    I’m disappointed that progressive leadership has resorted to distorting facts and spewing misinformation for a project that mostly serves developers and other special interests. Please help get this story straight. And if you’re going to pressure the legislature – please focus on schools and healthcare rather than the DOLRT boondoggle.

Check Also

Party like its 1929. Income inequality rivals era before the Great Depression

Before you dig out your flapper dresses and ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

A civil rights settlement forced DEQ to sample Duplin County waterways for pollution. The hard part [...]

On Friday the UNC Board of Governors rejected a proposal to return the Silent Sam Confederate monume [...]

They could be paved, mined, jammed with concrete, filled with pollutants like GenX or coal ash: More [...]

Shortly after 10 o’clock yesterday morning, a federal jury in the hog nuisance case Gillis vs. Murph [...]

The post How the Grinches stole the 9th District appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Fayetteville is my hometown more than any – I was born here to military parents, this is where my gr [...]

It’s long been understood by those who pay attention to public policy debates that the age-old conse [...]

The post The newest nuisance in the 9th: Election Fraud Scandal appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]