Commentary, News

Committee chair caught in lie/cover up re: hidden records at Kavanaugh hearing

If you still harbor any doubts that the ongoing implosion of the Trump administration has driven Republicans in Congress to take desperate measures in anticipation of the fall elections, yesterday’s incident at the Senate Judiciary Committee hearings on the Supreme Court nomination of Brett Kavanaugh ought to have put them to rest once and for all. As Zack Ford at Think Progress explains in a story entitled “Senate Republicans get caught in a major lie about the missing documents on Brett Kavanaugh,” it’s gotten to the point at which anything goes for the GOP:

“It’s objectively unprecedented for the Senate to be provided such a small fraction of the documents related to a Supreme Court nominee’s past work, as in the case of Judge Brett Kavanaugh. During Wednesday’s confirmation hearing, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-IL) caught Judiciary Committee Chairman Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA) in an apparent lie about why that is.

Durbin began his questioning of Kavanaugh by highlighting how conspicuous it is that the Senate has been deprived of so many documents from Kavanaugh’s time working for the Bush administration and that so many more have been unilaterally classified. More than 100,000 documents from Kavanaugh’s time in the Bush administration have been held back under the claim that they are protected by “executive privilege.” Bill Burck, a private attorney and longtime friend of Kavanaugh, has personally controlled what documents can be shared, instead of the National Archives and Records Administration as is the standard process.

Durbin told Kavanaugh that Burck has “some magic power to decide what the American people will see about your role in the White House.” He implored Kavanaugh to himself call for the proceedings to be suspended so there wouldn’t be “a cloud over this nomination.”

Grassley interrupted a moment later, however, to insist that the committee had been handling the documents in proper accordance with the Presidential Records Act.”

After explaining how Grassley then read a written statement alleging that Republicans had worked “hand in glove” with the National Archives in obtaining Kavanaugh’s documents, the article continues:

“Again, this was flagrantly untrue, and Durbin immediately called Grassley out. Indeed, the National Archives put out a statement last month clarifying that neither President Bush’s actions nor the Judiciary Committee’s decision to publish some of those documents represented the National Archives. It also said that because the volume of documents related to Kavanaugh’s tenure was so high, its review would not be fulfilled until late October.

Durbin entered the Archives’ statement into the committee’s record.

The way Grassley rushed to get the documents outside the normal procedure and then tried to cover it up shows how desperate Senate Republicans are to rush this confirmation process. They want Kavanaugh on the Court in time for the next session, so the entire reason the documents aren’t available is because they simply didn’t want to have to wait for the Archives to process them.”

Check Also

League of Women Voters: NC congressional redistricting process remains flawed

Criticism of the congressional redistricting process that’s been ...

Top Stories from NCPW

  • News
  • Commentary

When it began in 1919, it was “Armistice Day” — a celebration of the end of World War I. It became a [...]

Peter Romary worked for UNC board member Tom Fetzer, but claimed connections to Senate leader Phil B [...]

GREENSBORO – A Pender County graduate almost missed an opportunity to pursue his dream job because h [...]

Lawmakers criticize probe as "threat to academic freedom" U.S. Rep. Andy Levin (D-Michigan [...]

Back in the early 1990’s, the late and sorely missed Bob Hensley – a talented, feisty and frequently [...]

The post Berger on shaky ground appeared first on NC Policy Watch. [...]

Today marks 100 days since I filed an official request with the Department of Public Instruction to [...]

Yesterday, the North Carolina Supreme Court considered whether immigrants detained unlawfully under [...]